Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Goverdhan Das Meshram vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 1267 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1267 Chatt
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Goverdhan Das Meshram vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 17 January, 2025

                                              1




                                                            2025:CGHC:3059


                                                                        NAFR

                     HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Digitally
signed by
RAVI
SHANKAR
MANDAVI                            WPS No. 454 of 2025

            1 - Goverdhan Das Meshram S/o Late Naradram Meshram Aged About
            63 Years Retired Dak Runner Posted At Office Of S.D.O. Jal
            Sanshadhan Sub Division No. 01 Aadmabad, Water Resources
            Department,          District        Balod         Chhattisgarh

            2 - Hem Lal Rajak S/o Late Tjau Ram Aged About 74 Years Retired Met
            Posted At Office Of S.D.O. Jal Prabandh Sub Division No. 07 Water
            Resources Department District Baloda Bazar- Bhathapara Chhattisgarh

            3 - Ramu Dhruv S/o Late Chunu Ram Dhruv Aged About 69 Years
            Retired Labour Posted At Office Of S.D.O. Jal Prabandh Sub Division
            No. 07 Water Resources Department District Baloda Bazar- Bhathapara
            Chhattisgarh

            4 - Ramadhar Rajak S/o Late Tijau Ram Aged About 65 Years Retired
            Labour Posted At Office Of S.D.O. Jal Prabandh Sub Division No. 07
            Water Resources Department District Baloda Bazar- Bhathapara
            Chhattisgarh

            5 - Smt. Rekha Manikpuri W/o Late Girvar Das Manikpuri Aged About
            59 Years R/o Ward No. 57 Urla Baghera Road Ram Nagar Durg District
            Durg Chhattisgarh Husband Of Petitioner Was Retired Kushal Shayak/
            Shikshit Sahayak Posted At Office Of S.D.O. (E And M) Light Machinery
            Nalkoop And Gate Sub Division Durg Water Resources Department,
            District Durg Chhattisgarh
                                                               ... Petitioner(s)
                                           versus
            1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water
            Resources Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur District Raipur
                                     2

Chhattisgarh

2 - Engineer In Chief Water Resources, Department, Sihawa Bhawan
New         Raipur,        District     Raipur        Chhattisgarh

3 - Chief Engineer Mahanadi Godavari Kachhar Department Of Water
Resources      Raipur    District    -    Raipur    Chhattisgarh

4 - Executive Engineer Jal Sanshadhan Division Balod Water
Resources    Department,    District  Balod     Chhattisgarh

5 - Executive Engineer Jal Prabandh Division No. 02, Water Resources
Department     District  Baloda    Bazar-Bhathapara      Chhattisgarh

6 - Executive Engineer (E And M) Light Machinery Nalkoop And Gate,
Division - Durg, Water Resources Department, District - Durg
Chhattisgarh

7 - Joint Director Pension And Account Treasury Department Durg
Division,           District         Durg           Chhattisgarh

8 - Joint Director Pension And Account Treasury Department Raipur
Division, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
                                                ... Respondent(s)

(Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nilu Kumari Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Order on Board

17/01/2025

1. Heard Ms. Nilu Kumari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners

as well as Ms. Akanksha Verma, learned Panel Lawyer for the

State/respondent/s.

2. Since the matter is heard and decided finally, therefore, I.A.

No.01/2025, which is an application for exemption from filing

typed copies of annexure is allowed.

3. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for

following reliefs:

"10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the writ petition and be pleased to issue an order/direction to the respondents authorities to grant the benefit of leave encashment to the petitioners. 10.2. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner's matter.

10.3. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No. 1 to

4 & husband of petitioner No.5 were working as work charged

Contingency Paid Employees in the Water Resources

Department. Initially they were employed on temporary basis,

thereafter their services were regularized. The petitioner No. 1 to

4 and husband of petitioner No.5 after completion of age of

superannuation retired from service. The husband of petitioner

No.5 died after retirement. After retirement, the respondent

authorities granted pension and gratuity to the petitioners, but

benefit of leave encashment has not been granted to them. The

rules of payment of leave encashment is governed by the M.P.

Work-charged /Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules 1977,

which has been made by erstwhile State of Madhay Pradesh and

has been adopted by the state of C.G. under the exercise of

power conferred under article 309 of Constitution of India. The

petitioners are entitle for benefit of leave encashment as per

provision of rule 1977. The respondent authorities denied to grant

benefit of leave encashment on account of terms of circular dated

14.09.1992 issued by finance department. Learned counsel for

the petitioners submits that in the light of judgment passed by this

Court in Writ Petition (S) No.3870 of 2021 (Faguvaram Patel &

Ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.) and other connected

matters decided on 30.09.2022, the petitioners are entitled for

leave encashment.

5. Learned State counsel submits that sufficient documents have not

been filed by the petitioners and it is also not reflected as to

whether the petitioners have completed the minimum period of

service to avail the benefit of leave encashment.

6. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the

documents available in record.

7. Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this

petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to make

detailed representation before the concerned

respondent/competent authority within the period of '30 days'

from the date of receipt of copy of this order with all necessary

documents to substantiate their claim. In the event of filing of

representation, on due verification, if the petitioners are found to

be similarly situated persons, as in the case of Faguvaram Patel

(surpa), their claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of

judgment of Faguvaram Patel (Supra) expeditiously preferably

within the period of '90 days' from the date of submission of their

said representation.

8. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of with aforesaid

observations and directions.

Sd/-

(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter