Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Abhyuday Titiksh Sharma vs Ashok Kumar Sharma
2025 Latest Caselaw 903 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 903 Chatt
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Abhyuday Titiksh Sharma vs Ashok Kumar Sharma on 1 August, 2025

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal
Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal
                                          1




                                                          2025:CGHC:37905-DB


                                                                         NAFR

            HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                  FA No. 257 of 2015

Abhyuday Titiksh Sharma S/o Shri Ashok Sharma, Aged About 33 Years Aged
About 16 Years, As On The Date Of Filing Of Suit Present Age 23 Years,
Occupation - Student, Caste Brahman, R/o Leela Niwas, Baldeo Bagh,
Rajnandgaon Tehsil Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District Rajnandgaon
Chhattisgarh.........Plaintiff.
                                                               ... Appellant


                                       versus


1 - Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Shriniwas Sharma, Aged About 46
Years Caste Brahman, Occupation R. T. O. Agent, Shop No. 3, Near Pyarelal
School, Rajnandgaon, Tehsil Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District
Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
2 - Smt. Sumitra Soni W/o Shri Dayaram Soni, Aged About 54 Years
Occupation - Housewife, Caste Soni, R/o Bharkapara, Besides Kamal
Talkies, Ward No. 25, Tehsil Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District
Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
3 - Santosh Soni S/o Shri Dayaram Soni, Aged About 38 Years Occupation -
Business, Caste - Soni, R/o Bharkapara, Besides Kamal Talkies, Ward No.
25,   Tehsil    Rajnandgaon,       Civil And    Revenue   District   Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh.
4 - Sanjay Soni S/o Shri Dayaram Soni, Aged About 35 Years Occupation -
Business, Caste - Soni, R/o Bharkapara, Besides Kamal Talkies, Ward No.
25,   Tehsil    Rajnandgaon,       Civil And    Revenue   District   Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh.
                                        2

5 - Sachin Soni S/o Shri Dayaram Soni, Aged About 30 Years Occupation -
Business, Caste - Soni, R/o Bharkapara, Besides Kamal Talkies, Ward No.
25,   Tehsil    Rajnandgaon,    Civil And   Revenue   District   Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh.
6 - Smt. Suman Soni W/o Shri Santosh Soni, Aged About 34 Years
Occupation - Housewife, Caste - Soni, R/o Bharkapara, Besides Kamal
Talkies, Ward No. 25, Tehsil Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District
Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
7 - A Ku. Mahak D/o Shri Sanjay Soni, Aged About 10 Years Minor,
Represented Through Natural Guardian Father Shri Sanjay Soni, S/o Shri
Dayaram Soni, R/o Bharkapara, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
7.1 - Rohit S/o Shri Sanjay Soni, Aged 08 Years, Minor, Represented Through
Natural Guardian Father Shri Sanjay Soni, S/o Shri Dayaram Soni, R/o
Bharkapara, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
7.2 - Roshan S/o Shri Sanjay Soni, Aged 06 Years, Minor, Represented
Through Natural Guardian Father Shri Sanjay Soni, S/o Shri Dayaram Soni,
R/o Bharkapara, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
8 - Smt. Jagrati Soni W/o Shri Sachin Soni, Aged About 27 Years Occupation
- Housewife, Caste - Soni, R/o Bharkapara, Besides Kamal Talkies, Ward No.
25,   Tehsil    Rajnandgaon,    Civil And   Revenue   District   Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh...........Defendants.
                                                           ... Respondents


For Appellant         :    Mr. Ravi Agrawal, Advocate holding brief of Mr.
                          Anumesh Verma, Advocate
For Respondents       :   Mr. Shrawan Agrawal, Advocate


                  Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
                  Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
                          Judgment on Board
Per Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

01.08.2025

1. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the appellant is not ready and willing to further prosecute the appeal, therefore, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant.

3. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

                Sd/-                                                       Sd/-
        (Sanjay K. Agrawal)                                  (Sachin Singh Rajput)
             Judge                                              Judge




   amita





AMITA DUBEY            DUBEY

Date: 2025.08.06 15:00:03 +0530

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter