Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2764 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2025
2025:CGHC:41402-DB
Digitally
signed by
HARNEET
HARNEET KAUR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
KAUR Date:
2025.08.20
11:07:02
+0530
FA No. 366 of 2018
Ashutosh Pandey versus Davnarayan
Order Sheet
18/08/2025 Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, counsel for the appellants.
Mr. Suman Kesari, counsel for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Sharad Mishra, P.L. for the State/respondent No. 3.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that Smt. Asha Pandey was already representing appellants/plaintiffs No. 1 and 2 namely Ashutosh Pandey and Umakant Pandey, being their guardian mother, from the date of institution of the suit before the trial Court, however, when her husband i.e. respondent/defendant No. 2 namely Sammukh Prasad Pandey died during the pendency of this appeal, instead of deleting his name from the cause title, the name of his wife Smt. Asha Pandey has been substituted in the cause title mistakenly, therefore, he may be permitted to delete the name of Smt. Asha Pandey as legal heir of respondent/defendant No. 2 from the cause title.
In view of the aforesaid reason, learned counsel for the appellants is permitted to delete the name of Smt. Asha Pandey as legal heir of respondent/defendant No. 2 from the cause title during the course of the day.
Judgment passed separately.
Signed and dated.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sachin Singh Rajput)
JUDGE JUDGE
Harneet
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!