Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 20 Chatt
Judgement Date : 1 April, 2025
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
CRA No. 2167 of 2024
1 - Suresh Singh S/o Puran Singh Aged About 20 Years R/o Village
Chhotekalua, Police Station Khadganwa, Distt. Manendragarh-Chirmiri-
Bharatpur (C.G.)
2 - Deepak Singh S/o Nahar Singh Aged About 24 Years R/o Village
Sarma, Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
... Appellants
-Versus-
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Khadganwa, District-
Manendragarh Chirmiri Bharatpur (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondent
(Cause title taken from Case Information System)
Order Sheet
01/04/2025 Mr. Hemant Kumar Agrawal, Advocate for the appellants.
VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN
Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State.
By the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence
dated 14.10.2024, passed in Special Criminal Case No. 07 of
2023, by learned Special Judge (POCSO Act 2012) Chirmiri,
District Korea (C.G.), the appellants have been convicted and
sentenced as under:
Conviction Sentence
U/s. 4 of POCSO Act R.I. for 20 years and fine of
Rs. 500/-, in default of
payment of fine further R.I. for
01 month.
Heard on I.A. No. 1 of 2024 (application under Section
430 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for suspension
of sentence and grant of bail).
Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that
the appellants are innocent and have been falsely implicated
in the offence. There is no legally admissible evidence with
respect to the age of the victim. The offence against the
appellants have not been proved beyond reasonable doubt.
On the same set of evidence, two other accused persons have
been acquitted by the learned trial Court and the evidence of
the prosecution witnesses as well as the victim is inconsistent.
There is no injury found on the body of the victim. The
appellants are in jail since 20.01.2023 and final adjudication of
the case will take its own time. Therefore, the appellants may
be enlarged on bail.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State
opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the
appellants and submits that the victim was minor on the date
of incident, which has been proved by the school record. She
made positive allegations against both the appellants in her
evidence. The FSL report is found positive and she disclosed
the entire incident in her evidence that the manner in which
she was subjected to rape by the appellants. It is not the case
that the victim was the consenting party with the appellants
and she being the minor girl, subjected to rape by both the
appellants, their bail application is liable to be dismissed.
We have heard learned counsel for the parties and
perused the record.
Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the parties, considering the evidence available on
record and also the fact that the victim was minor at the time
of incident and FSL report was found positive, we are not
inclined to release the appellants on bail.
Accordingly, the I.A. No. 1 of 2024 (application under
Section 430 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for
suspension of sentence and grant of bail) is rejected.
List this matter for final hearing in due course.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice
ved
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!