Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 341 Chatt
Judgement Date : 20 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
(Proceedings through video conferencing)
Order Sheet
CRA No. 467 of 2021
Parmeshwar Chandravanshi S/o Lilhar Chandravanshi Aged About 20 Years R/o Village-
Aalikhuta, Thana- Tumdibod, Distt- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon,
Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Thana- Balod , District- Balod, Chhattisgarh., District : Balod,
Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
20/01/2022 Shri Samir Singh, counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Beenu Sharma, Panel Lawyer for the State.
Heard on I.A. No.1 of 2021, application under Section 389 of Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence and grant of bail to the appellant.
By the impugned judgment dated 26/03/2021 passed by the Special Sessions
Judge (in-charge F.T.C.) District Balod (C.G.) in Special Sessions Case No 18/2019, the
appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under :-
Conviction Sentence
Under Section 363 of Indian R.I. for three years and fine of Rs.
Penal Code 500/-. In default of payment of
fine additional R.I. for one month.
Under Section 366 of Indian R.I. for five years and fine of Rs.
Penal Code 500/-. In default of payment of
fine additional R.I. for one month.
Under Section 376 (2)(I) of R.I. for ten years and fine of Rs.
Indian Penal Code 1000/-. In default of payment of
fine additional R.I. for two months.
Under Section 3(A)/4 of R.I. for seven years and fine of
Protection of Children from Rs. 1000/-. In default of payment
Sexual Offences Act, 2012 of fine additional R.I. for two
months.
(All the sentences run
concurrently and fine amount
separately recovered)
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that impugned judgment is per se
illegal and bad in law. The appellant is in jail since 22/02/2019, disposal of the appeal is
likely to take some time, therefore, the appellant be released on bail.
On the other hand, State counsel opposes the bail application.
Heard learned counsel for both the parties.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the evidence of prosecutrix
PW-1 and her father PW-3, age of the prosecutrix mentioned in the dakhil-kharij register
and other evidence available on record, I am not inclined to release the applicant on
bail. Accordingly I.A. No. 1/2021 is rejected.
List this appeal for final hearing in due course.
Sd/-
(Gautam Chourdiya)
JUDGE
Kamde
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!