Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3330 Chatt
Judgement Date : 26 November, 2021
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Appeal No. 809 of 2010
Jitendra Pal Sharma, S/o Late Shri Chunnilal Sharma, Aged about 53 years,
Assistant Engineer, Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd., R/o Quarter No. 64-C,
Sector - 1, BALCO Nagar, Korba, District Bilaspur (M.P.) (Now Chhattisgarh)
---- Appellant
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh) Through : The C.B.I.,
Jabalpur (M.P.)
---- Respondent/State
For Appellant : Shri Sourabh Dangi, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Rahim Ubwani, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya, J Order 26.11.2021
1. This appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence
dated 31.07.1997 passed by the Fifth Additional Sessions Judge & Special
Judge, CBI, Sessions Division, Jabalpur (M.P.) in Special Case No. 19/1988,
whereby the appellant stands convicted and sentenced as under:-
Conviction Sentence
Under Section 409 of IPC Rigorous imprisonment for two years
& six months and to pay fine of
Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of
fine, to undergo rigorous
imprisonment for six months
Under Section 5 (1) (c) read Rigorous imprisonment for two years
with Section 5 (2) of the and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in
Prevention of Corruption Act, default of payment of fine, to
1947 undergo rigorous imprisonment for
six months
2. The instant appeal was in fact filed in the year 1997 and registered as Cr.A.
No. 1735/1997 in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. However,
subsequently the same has been received by this Court on transfer from
High Court of Madhya Pradesh and registered as Cr.A. No. 809/2010.
3. In this case, the sole appellant died on 21.07.2005 which is evident from the
death certificate of appellant & other documents submitted by the S.H.O.,
Police Station Balconagar, District Korba (C.G.).
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though he has informed
about the pendency of the present appeal to the legal heirs of the appellant,
but no instruction has been received from them till now.
5. Considering the fact that the appellant died on 21.07.2005, the fact
regarding pendency of the present appeal was well within the knowledge of
family members of the appellant and despite that no application was moved
on behalf of the legal heirs of the appellant to prosecute this appeal, the
present appeal stands abated and is disposed of as such.
Sd/-
(Gautam Chourdiya) Judge vatti
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!