Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krishna Kumar Agrawal vs Shivam Real Infra Developers Pvt. ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3068 Chatt

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3068 Chatt
Judgement Date : 9 November, 2021

Chattisgarh High Court
Krishna Kumar Agrawal vs Shivam Real Infra Developers Pvt. ... on 9 November, 2021
                                                                           1



                                                                                                                                                   NAFR
                          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
                                            FIRST APPEAL NO. 403 OF 2018

•     Krishna Kumar Agrawal, S/o Shri Pawan Kumar Agrawal, aged 36
years, R/o Naya Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.)

                                                                                                                                  ... Appellant
                                                                      versus
1.     Shivam Real Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd., through Director Sandeep
Pandey, S/o Late Vinod Kumar Pandey, R/o L-4, Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur,
Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.)
2.     The State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, Bilaspur, District
Bilaspur (C.G.)
                                                  ... Respondents
____________________________________________________________
     For Appellant            :    Mr. Shishir Dixit, Advocate.
     For Respondent No.1      :    Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate.
     For Respondent No.2      :    Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, P.L.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

                 Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
                 Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
                          Order on Board
                           [09/11/2021]
Per, P. Sam Koshy, J.

1. Matter is taken up for hearing on I.A. No.3 which is an Application

filed by the disputing parties i.e. the Appellant-Defendant and Respondent

No.1-Plaintiff, in terms of Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. Shri Krishna Kumar Agrawal, the Appellant himself is present in

person along with his Counsel Shri Shishir Dixit, Advocate.

3. On behalf of Respondent No.1-Company, the two Partners Smt.

Kunti Pandey and Shri Sandeep Pandey are also present along with their

Counsel Shri K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate.

4. The present First Appeal is a Defendant's appeal assailing the

Judgment and Decree dated 5.4.2018 passed by the 6 th Additional

Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. (A)/413A/2014.

5. Vide the said Judgment and Decree, the suit for specific performance

of contract entered into between the parties was ordered to be enforced.

6. The present Appeal was admitted as early as on 13.8.2018 and

notices were issued to the other side. Pending the Appeal before this Court,

the present Application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil

Procedure has been filed on behalf of the disputing parties i.e. the

Appellant and the Respondent No.1.

7. Both learned Counsel for Appellant and learned Counsel for

Respondent No.1 submit that pending the Appeal before this Court the

parties have entered into an out of court settlement and the terms and

conditions of the settlement has been reflected in the Deed of Settlement

dated 2.4.2021 enclosed along with the aforesaid Application (I.A. No.3).

8. In terms of the settlement, the Appellant has agreed to pay an

amount of Rs.40 Lakh to Respondent No.1 and which he has already paid

by way of two Demand Drafts, one for Rs.30 Lakh through Demand Draft

No.500103, dated 10.3.2021 and another for Rs.10 Lakh through Demand

Draft No.500106, dated 19.3.2021. On receipt of the said amount, the

Respondent-Plaintiff has filed an Affidavit in this regard and has also given

an undertaking that they shall henceforth not make any claim for

enforcement of the Agreement that was entered into with the Appellant-

Defendant on 29.6.2010.

9. Both the parties i.e. the Appellant as also the two of the Directors of

Respondent No.1-Company, present in the Court, submit that in the light of

the settlement arrived at between the parties and the consideration that the

Appellant has paid to Respondent No.1, they do not want to pursue the

present First Appeal any further.

10. Let the Appellant as also the two of the Directors of Respondent

No.1-Company appear before the Registrar (Judicial) during the course of

the day itself and record their respective statement in respect of the

settlement arrived at which may form part of the record of the Appeal.

11. Accordingly, in terms of the Deed of Settlement dated 2.4.2021, the

impugned Judgment and Decree dated 5.4.2018 passed in Civil Suit No.

(A)/413A/2014 stands set aside/quashed.

12. Let a fresh Decree be drawn by the Registry in terms of the

Settlement arrived at between the parties. The Deed of Settlement entered

into between the parties on 2.4.2021 be also made a part of the Decree.

13. First Appeal accordingly stands disposed of.

           Sd/-                                            Sd/-
      (P. Sam Koshy)                                  (Rajani Dubey)
          JUDGE                                           JUDGE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter