Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Chhattisgarh vs Ravishankar Sahu
2021 Latest Caselaw 76 Chatt

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 76 Chatt
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2021

Chattisgarh High Court
State Of Chhattisgarh vs Ravishankar Sahu on 8 April, 2021
                                                    1

                                                                                          NAFR

                          HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                            CRMP No.1014 of 2020

              • State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Lalbag, District- Rajnandgaon,
                Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

                                                                                 ---- Petitioner

                                                 Versus

              • Ravishankar Sahu S/o Rupendra Sahu Aged About 23 Years R/o Village-
                Mandhak Chowk Parikala, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Rajnandgaon,
                Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
                                                                             ---- Respondent

Shri Lalit Jangde, Dy.GA for petitioner/State.

Division Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava & Hon'ble Smt. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board

08/04/2021

1. Heard on prayer for grant of leave to appeal.

2. Though learned State counsel submits that as against the accused, there is circumstantial evidence of recovery of Gamchha (stole) and query report moved by the doctor that the deceased could be strangulated by this seized Gamchha, we find that in the present case, the recovery of Gamchha is extremely weak kind of evidence, which does not contain any bloodstain. Therefore, except this, as against the present accused, no other evidence could be led by the prosecution.

3. Taking into consideration the lack of clinching circumstantial evidence, the learned trial Court has acquitted the accused by giving him benefit of doubt. Therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment of acquittal.

4. Accordingly, the application (Cr.M.P.No.1014 of 2020) is dismissed.

                            SD/-                                        SD/-
                  (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava)               (Narendra Kumar Vyas)
                            Judge                                      Judge


Tumane
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter