Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1601 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2024
OCD - 1
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
COMMERCIAL DIVISION
CS-COM/21/2024
[OLD NO: CS/486/1998]
KALPATRU AGROFOREST ENTERPRISES PVT.LTD.
VS
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR
Date: 2nd May, 2024 Appearance:
Mr. Shuvasish Sengupta, Adv.
Mr. Balarko Sen, Adv.
Ms. Subhra Das, Adv.
...for the Plaintiff.
The Court: Report of the Master-in-Charge & official Referee, Original Side
dated 30th April, 2024 is perused. The following correction is made in the original
Judgment at the end of page 6, the sentence "Therefore, the Plaintiff is entitled to a
decree of permanent injunction in terms of the prayer (a)" shall be substituted by
"Therefore, the Plaintiff is entitled to appropriate decree of permanent injunction."
It is stated in the report that prayer (d) is not reflected in the concise
statement. This objection is a mere technicality and might be an error; the same
should not be looked into very seriously.
The decree may be drawn up accordingly in terms of the corrected judgment.
(SUGATO MAJUMDAR, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!