Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pratik Barua And Ors vs Sm. Anuva Barua And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 421 Cal/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 421 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2024

Calcutta High Court

Pratik Barua And Ors vs Sm. Anuva Barua And Ors on 5 February, 2024

Author: Sugato Majumdar

Bench: Sugato Majumdar

O-3
                          IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                           Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
                                    ORIGINAL SIDE


                                  IA NO. GA/18/2023
                                    In CS/993/1960

                              PRATIK BARUA AND ORS.
                                        Vs
                             SM. ANUVA BARUA AND ORS.


  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR

Date : 5th February, 2024.

Appearance:

Mr. Saurav Chaudhuri,Adv.

...for defendants.

Mr. D. Purkayastha,Adv.

Mr. Sagar Chowdhury,Adv.

Mr. Rajiv Lall, Adv.

...for def. nos. D/3( c ) & D/3(d).

Mr. Apratim Bhattacharya,Adv.

..for def. 4(a)

The Court:- None appears on behalf of the plaintiffs.

This suit came in the list on mention, for clarification.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that writ may be issued to the

Commissioners of Partition in terms of the Original Side rules to avoid any future

complication. It is agreed and accordingly, let the writ be issued to the Commissioners

of Partition enabling them to work properly.

A report is filed by Mr. S.P. Ghosh dated 5th February, 2024 wherein it is stated

that he has presently a corpus of fund out of sale proceeds of gold coins.

Learned counsel for Mr. S.P.Ghosh submits that he is in custody of the sale

proceeds of the coins only. There is no ambiguity that sale proceeds of the coins are in

fact, a sale proceeds of joint property. When coins were joint properties, there is no

reason why the amount of sale proceeds shall not be treated as a common fund. After

partition by meets and bounds, funds shall be distributed retrievably and

proportionately among the parties after paying all the outgoings. Work of

Commissioners of Partition and payment to them must be out of joint fund for this

purpose. Mr. S.P. Ghosh shall pay the remuneration of the Commissioners of Partition

out of the same fund.

Mr. Apratim Bhattacharya, learned advocate representing the defendant no.4(a)

expresses intention to desire to retire from the assignment of the Commissioner of

Partition.

He is allowed. Mr. Apratim Bhattacharya craves leave to file application for his

replacement as Commissioner of Partition.

Leave is granted. Payment to Mr. Apratim Bhattacharya of Rs.50,000/- shall be

considered along with the application. Let the writ to Commissioner of Partition be

issued and survey work may be expedited. Other Commissioners of Partition shall be

paid Rs.50,000/- each.

Mr. S.P. Ghosh, learned Receiver shall submit a further report stating the status

of the amount of the fund in his custody.

In view of absence of the plaintiff, as submitted, either of the defendants, are at

liberty to file proper application praying for transposition subject to extant rules and

law.

Learned Registrar, Original Side shall inform about the preliminary decree or

report on drawing up preliminary decree along with judgment passed for preliminary

decree as well as the report of the Commissioners of Partition.

The suit will appear in the list on 19th February, 2024.

(SUGATO MAJUMDAR, J.)

D.Ghosh

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter