Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7071 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2023
23. 12.10.2023
Court No.6
.Tanmoy Ghosh
MAT 1817 of 2023
Biplab Biswas
-Versus-
Sri Nripen Dey & Ors.
With
IA No: CAN/1/2023
With
IA No: CAN/2/2023
Mr. D.K. Sengupta, Adv.,
Ms. Sweta Saha, Adv.
...for the applicant/appellant.
Mr. Pranit Bag, Adv.,
Mr. Mrinmoy Mohan Barat, Adv.
...for the respondent no.1/
writ petitioner.
Mr. Srijan Nayak, Adv., Mrs. Rituparna Maitra, Adv., Mr. Biplab Das, Adv., Mr. Ankit Surekha, Adv.
...for the West Bengal Co-operative Election Commission.
Mr. Soumyadeep Biswas, Adv.
...for the respondent no.11.
In Re: IA No: CAN/1/2023
This is an application for leave to appeal against a
judgment and order dated September 12, 2023, whereby
the writ petition of the respondent no.1 herein being
WPA 21517 of 2023, was disposed of by a learned Single
Judge of this Court.
The applicant says that he is a member of Dignagar
Samabay Krishi Unnyan Samity Limited, being a
primary Co-operative Society and is affected by the order
impugned. The learned Judge has directed completion of
the election of the Board of Directors of Nadia District
Central Co-operative Bank Limited, without first
ensuring that election of the primary Co-operative
Societies is completed.
Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, we
are of the view that the applicant may have something to
say as regards the order he seeks to challenge.
Accordingly, leave is granted to the applicant to prefer
appeal against the judgment and order dated September
12, 2023.
This application being IA No: CAN/1/2023 is
allowed.
In Re: MAT 1817 of 2023 With IA No: CAN/2/2023
By consent of the appearing parties, the appeal and
the connected application are taken up together for
hearing.
The respondent no. 1/writ petitioner had
approached the learned Single Judge with the grievance
that although the tenure of the Board of Directors of
Nadia District Central Co-operative Bank Limited (in
short, 'the Bank') was to expire on September 15, 2023,
and although draft voters' list had been published and
objections thereto had been invited and considered, the
final voters' list has not been published, without which
election could not be held. The learned Judge disposed
of the writ petition with the following directions:-
" As it appears that the term of the Board of Directors will expire within a couple of days, accordingly, the respondent no.3 is directed to take prompt necessary steps to conduct and
conclude the election in accordance with law, at the earliest, but positively within a period of three months from the date of communication of a copy of this order.
The Commission shall ensure that the election is conducted peacefully in free and fair manner.
It will be open for the Commission to seek assistance from the concerned police station and other authorities for the purpose of conducting the election peacefully, in a free and fair manner."
The appellant says that unless the election of the
primary Co-operative Societies is first held, the election
of the Board of Directors of the Bank cannot be held.
The appellant has made a statement in paragraph 4 of
the stay petition (IA No: CAN/2/2023) to the following
effect:-
"4. ... The petitioner states that being a member of the member Co-operative Society have filed an application in the writ Petition being WPA 21517 OF 2023 for addition of Party vide C.A.N. 2 of 2023 but the same was not taken up for hearing and the Hon'ble Court even after hearing the parties simpliciter directed for completion of the election of the District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd within a period of three months from the date of communication of the Order without considering the contention of the petitioner that election of the District Bank without convoking delegates from elected bodies of Primary member Societies shall be void, illegal and in violation of the provision of the Statute."
Mr. Bag, learned Advocate appearing for the
respondent no.1 herein, says that the aforesaid
statement is incorrect. No application had been filed by
the present appellant before the learned Single Judge.
Mr. Sengupta, learned Advocate appearing for the
appellant, in his usual fairness, says that Mr. Bag is
correct. The application was sought to be moved unlisted
but the same was not allowed. He tenders apology on
behalf of the appellant for having made a misstatement,
as aforesaid.
We are not inclined to interfere with the order
under appeal. The appellant's application was admittedly
not listed before the learned Single Judge and in fact we
are told, had not even been filed. Hence, there is no
reason why we should entertain the present appeal
which is accordingly dismissed along with the connected
application.
However, this will not prevent the appellant from
pursuing such other remedy that he may have in
accordance with law.
Since we have not called for affidavits, the
allegations in the stay petition shall be deemed not to
have been admitted by the respondents.
The appeal being MAT 1817 of 2023 and the
connected application being IA No: CAN/2/2023 are
accordingly dismissed.
Let urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be made available to the parties upon
compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!