Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3606 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 May, 2023
19.05.2023
Court No.12
S/L. No. 4
Suvayan/
Sourav
FA 466 of 2003
With
CAN 13 of 2023
Badal Das @ Badal Chandra Das & Ors.
Vs.
The Land Acquisition Collector, Darjeeling & Ors.
Mr. Debashis Kundu, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Soumyen Datta
Mr. R. N. Barik
... for the appellants.
Mr. Ram Chandra Guchhait
... for the State/respondent.
In Re: CAN 13 of 2023
1. Having heard the learned Counsel for the
petitioners/appellants wants to withdraw the
application.
2. Accordingly, the interim application being CAN
13 of 2023 is dismissed as withdrawn. The
amended cause title is undertaken to be filed in
Court today be accepted by the A.C.O. in course
of this day or by the reopening day and it should
be incorporated in the memo of the appeal.
3. Pending filing of the aforesaid amended cause
title the appeal shall be taken up for disposal
today.
In Re: FA 466 of 2003
1. Heard Mr. Debasish Kundu, learned Senior
Counsel appearing for the land loosers/appellants and
Mr. Ram Chandra Guchhait, learned Counsel
appearing for the State.
2. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the
appellants that the present appeal is squarely covered
by the determination made by a co-ordinate Bench of
this Court in FA 203 of 2013 and other appeals
disposed of on 22.11.2017 [2017 SCC Online Cal.
18181: (2017) 5 CHN 507 (DB): (2018) 181 AIC 808:
(2018) 1 Cal. L.J 559]. In all the present appeals some
of which are appeals by the private individuals/land
loosers and some of which are cross appeals/appeals
by the State of West Bengal, the date of possession of
the land was 22.10.1984 and the date of publication of
notice under Section 4(1A) of the West Bengal Act II of
1948 (the Act II of 1948, for short) is 02.06.1987.
Learned Counsel for the State also fairly
contended that this appeal is covered by the decision
of aforesaid co-ordinate Bench. It is also submitted by
learned Counsel for the State that the State has
preferred no appeal against judgment passed by
learned Additional District Judge, Darjeeling after
remand.
3. It is strenuously submitted by the learned
Counsel for the appellants that the area of the land
looser covered in the present appeal is of the same
locality with which the judgment passed in FA 203 of
2013 and other appeals disposed of on 22.11.2017 by
the co-ordinate Bench (Supra) is concerned. On
perusal of the aforesaid judgment and the appeal
memos in the present case, we are satisfied that the
judgment passed by the co-ordinate Bench in FA 203
of 2013 and other appeals on 22.11.2017 squarely
covers the facts of the present appeal.
4. In the present appeal different points are raised,
inter alia, the multiplier to be applied instead of 8 to
10; deduction towards cultivation cost be reduced
from 50% to 20%; quantum of loss of earning and
solatium are to be revisited in terms of the market
value as decided in FA 203 of 2013 and other appeals.
5. Regard being had to such facts and submissions
and our satisfaction to the effect that judgment passed
in FA 203 of 2013 and other appeals squarely covers
the field so far as the present appeal is concerned, we
remand the matter to the learned Additional District
Judge, 1st Court, Darjeeling to revisit the matter in the
appeal in the light of the judgment passed by the co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in FA 203 of 2013 and
other appeals on 22.11.2017 (Supra).
6. The entire exercise be completed within a period
of six months from the date of receipt of records from
this Court. The parties are directed not to indulge in
any unnecessary adjournments in the matter. In
revisiting the matter on remand, learned Additional
District Judge, 1st Court, Darjeeling shall be guided by
the exercise made by this Court in Land Acquisition
Case No. 2 of 1997 after the remand by the co-ordinate
Bench in FA 203 of 2013 and other appeals disposed
of on 22.11.2017 (Supra).
7. Learned Additional District Judge, 1st Court,
Darjeeling is directed to do the needful for directing
the payment of at least 50% of the original awarded
amount along with interest during the pendency of the
matter on remand on filing of proper application to
that effect.
8. Accordingly, the impugned order in the appeal is
set aside and the matter is remanded.
9. The records be sent down immediately to the
learned Trial Court through special messenger at the
cost of the land looser.
10. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of.
(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.)
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!