Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3076 Cal
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2023
01.05.2023 rc/ct.no.237 Item No.24
C.O.No. 254 of 2023 Smt. Tapasi Koley Vs.
Ashok Adak & Ors.
Mr. Siva Prasad Ghose ...for the petitioner
Mr. Sukanta Chakraborty Mr. Anindya Halder ...for the Opposite Parties
This revisional application assailed the order no. 7
dated December 22, 2022 passed by the learned Civil
Judge, Junior Division, 4th Court at Serampore, Hooghly in
connection with Title Suit No. 528 of 2022 whereby the
learned judge refused to entertain the application under
Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking police
assistance to protect the ex parte ad interim injunction
passed by the learned Court on September 23, 2022.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
petitioner submitted that the learned trial judge can very
well exercise the inherent power under Section 151 of the
Code of Civil Procedure to protect the ex parte ad interim
injunction. In support of his contention he has referred to
several judgments as well as that of the Hon'ble Apex
Court in Meera Chauhan Vs. Harish Bishnoi & Anr.
reported in (2007) 12 SCC 2001.
Learned advocate on behalf of the opposite parties
relied upon the judgment passed by a coordinate Bench in
C.O.No. 3197 of 2015 (Basanti Devi Shaw & Ors. Vs.
Chandra Prakash Gupta & Ors.). Learned advocate for the
opposite parties submitted that the opposity parties never
violated the ex parte ad interim injunction order. So
question of exercise of power under Section 151 of the
Code of Civil Procedure seeking police assistance does not
arise.
Learned advocate on behalf of the opposite parties
submitted that the opposite parties never violated the ex
parte ad interim injunction order in any manner
whatsoever.
On careful perusal of the order impugned I find that
the learned judge refused the application under Section
151 of the Code of Civil Procedure relying on a case of AV
Kunhumerhammed Vs. KIV Mammi reported in AIR 1999
Ker 383(DB) wherein it was observed that the Court shall
not interfere in matter involving civil rights with an order
of police protection on the basis of an ex parte ad interim
injunction of the Civil Court.
However, in view of the decisions referred to on
behalf of the petitioner as well as stage of proceedings
pending before the Trial Court I am of the view that the
learned judge can very well exercise the power under
Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking police
assistance for the protection of the ex parte ad interim
injunction.
It is submitted that the opposite parties did not
participate at the time of hearing of the application under
Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
In the aforesaid view of the matter I am of the
opinion that the order impugned dated December 22, 2022
is not sustainable in law and is liable to be set aside.
Learned Trial Judge is requested to rehear the
application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil
Procedure pursuant to the aforesaid observation after
giving an opportunity of being heard to the opposite
parties.
Learned Trial Judge is also requested to dispose of
the application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil
Procedure seeking police assistance within 15 days from
the date of communication of this order.
Both the parties to the suit shall appear before the
learned Trial Court on the date fixed for hearing.
With the above observations and directions this
revisional application stands disposed of.
There shall be, however, no order as to costs.
Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied
for, be furnished to the parties upon compliance of
necessary formalities.
(Bibhas Ranjan De,J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!