Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2156 Cal
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2023
30.03.2023
ap
12
WPA 4011 of 2023
Dr. Snigdhashree Baliarsingh
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sobham Majumder
Ms. Kalpita Paul
... For the petitioner.
Mr. Firdous Samim
Ms. Gopa Biswas
Ms. Mousumi Hazra
Ms. Payel Shome
... For the College.
Mr. Amitabrata Ray
Mr. Pradip Kumar Ghosh
... For the University.
Mr. Swapan Kr. Datta, AGP,
Mr. Tapas Kr. Dey
... For the State.
The writ petition was received keeping the point of
maintainability open.
The petitioner submits that this writ petition is
maintainable in view of the Supreme Court judgment
reported at (2015) 16 SCC 530 (Janet Jeyapaul vs. SRM
University).
While the College submits that this writ petition is
not maintainable, citing a judgment of a Coordinate
Bench of this Court reported at 2021 SCC Online
Calcutta 3285 (Mainnak Mohan Das vs. State of West
Bengal).
2
Let the affidavit-in-opposition be filed by the
respondents within two weeks from date; reply thereto,
if any, be filed by the petitioner within one week
thereafter.
Interim order granted earlier is extended for a
further period of four weeks or until further orders
whichever is earlier.
Mr. N.C. Bihani, learned advocate is requested to
assist the Court in deciding the issue of maintainability
of the writ petition.
All parties will make over a copy of the pleadings
to Mr. Bihani.
List this matter after three weeks under the
heading 'For Orders' at 2-00 p.m.
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!