Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Punjab National Bank And Others vs Shri Tapas Dhara And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 1895 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1895 Cal
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Punjab National Bank And Others vs Shri Tapas Dhara And Others on 22 March, 2023
March 22, 2023
Sl. No.30
Court No.1
s.biswas
                                    FMA 14 of 2023
                                         With
                                     CAN 1 of 2023
                           Punjab National Bank and others
                                         vs.
                             Shri Tapas Dhara and others

                  Dr. Chapales Bandyopadhyay,
                  Ms. Anandamayee Dutta,
                  Ms. Atmaja Bandyopadhyay,
                  Mr. Monojit Das,
                  Ms. Gargy Basu, Advocates
                                                       ... for the appellants
                  Mr. Kishore Mukherjee,
                  Mr. Sankha Subhra Ray,
                  Mr. Ahitagni Dey, Advocates
                                        ... for the respondent Nos.1 and 2

Mr. Dwajadas Chakraborty, Ms. Paushali Banerjee, Advocates ... for the respondent Nos.3 to 5 (KMC)

The affidavit of service filed by the appellants is

taken on record.

Learned counsel for the appellants has

submitted that it was a non-statutory contract

relating to payment of proper tax. Hence, in view of

the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the

matter of M/s. Radhakrishna Agarwal and others

vs. State of Bihar and others reported in AIR 1977

SC 1496, writ is not the proper remedy. He further

submits that the appellants were not given any

opportunity to file affidavit-in-opposition and learned

Single Judge has entered into the arena of disputed

question of fact and that the amount in respect of

the area in occupation of the appellants has not been

ascertained.

FMA 14 of 2023

Though learned counsel for the respondent writ

petitioner has tried to defend the order of the learned

Single Judge, but he has not advanced any

argument on the issue if such a non-statutory

contract relating to payment of tax can be enforced

by way of writ petition.

We are of the view that the above question

needs to be examined by the Court. Hence the

operation of the impugned order of the learned

Single Judge is stayed till the next date of hearing.

List on 3rd May, 2023.

(Prakash Shrivastava, C.J.)

(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter