Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1708 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 March, 2023
15.03.2023
Item No.10
Court No.6.
S. De
M.A.T. 420 of 2023
With
I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023
Merlin Projects Limited & Ors.
Vs
Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Mr. Arindam Banerjee,
Ms. Rajshree Kajaria,
Ms. V. Kedia,
...for the appellants.
Mr. Alak Kr. Ghosh,
Mr. Swapan Kr. Debnath,
...for the K.M.C.
Mr. Satyajit Talukder,
...for the K.M.D.A.
A judgment and order dated February 8, 2023
whereby the writ petition of the appellants being WPA
3061 of 2020 was disposed of, is under challenge in
this appeal.
The petitioners approached the learned Single
Judge assailing the notices of hearing issued by the
Municipal Commissioner. The writ petitioners took
exception to the methodology adopted by the
Corporation in assessing the concerned property as
appeared from the notices of hearing.
The learned Judge noted that the objection of
the writ petitioners was pending consideration at the
end of the Corporation. Accordingly, the learned
Judge disposed of the writ petition with the following
observations:-
2
"As it appears that the objection filed
by the petitioners is pending
consideration at the end of the Kolkata
Municipal Corporation, accordingly, the
present writ petition is disposed of by
directing the Municipal Commissioner,
Kolkata Municipal Corporation, being
the respondent no.2, to take a decision
on the objection filed by the petitioners on December 24, 2019 strictly in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and all other necessary parties and pass a reasoned order within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of a copy of this order and communicate the reasoned order to the parties immediately thereafter.
The petitioners will be entitled to rely upon the provisions of law and the decisions delivered by the Court in similar issues at the time of hearing.
It is made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the claim of the petitioners and all points are left open to be decided by the aforesaid respondent at the time of consideration of the objection."
Being aggrieved, the writ petitioners have come
up by way of this appeal.
Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appearing for the
appellants/writ petitioners says that having a hearing
before the Municipal Commissioner would be
an exercise in futility since the law is now settled that
property owned by Kolkata Metropolitan Development
Authority has to be assessed under the provisions of
Section 176 and not under Section 174(2) of the
Kolokata Municipal Corporation Act. He says that the
notices of hearing should be quashed.
We have heard Mr. Banerjee at some length. He
seeks some time to cite relevant decisions covering the
issue in question.
List the matter once again on March 20, 2023.
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!