Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3924 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 June, 2023
D/L Item No 20 19.06.2023
KOLE FMA 788 of 2019 With IA No. CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No. 8828 of 2019)
Sri Banamali Samui
-Vs.-
The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Ms. Susmita Dey (Basu) ... for the appellant.
Mr. Alok Kr. Ghosh, Mr. Swapan Kr. Debnath, ... for the KMC.
The original of CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No. 8828 of 2019)
is not available in the records. The Department has given a
note that the same could not be traced. Let two
authenticated copies of CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No. 8828 of
2019) be made available to our Court Officer in course of the
day, to be retained with the records.
A judgment and order dated October 4, 2018,
whereby the appellant's writ petition being WP No. 18727
(W) of 2018 was disposed of, is under challenge in this
appeal.
We fail to see how the appeal is maintainable. The
order assailed reads as follows:-
"Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition and to file the same on the self- same cause of action before the appropriate forum.
The Corporation Authority is represented.
In such circumstances, W.P. No. 18727 (W) of 2018 is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for."
The learned Judge decided no right of the writ
petitioner. In any event, the writ petitioner having
withdrawn the writ petition with liberty file afresh before the
appropriate forum, he cannot challenge such order.
Learned Advocate for the appellant says that the writ
petitioner's only prayer is for consideration of his
representation made to the concerned officer in the Kolkata
Municipal Corporation. The corporation not having
considered such representation, the appellant had
approached the learned Single Judge. That was the
appropriate forum. There must have been some deficiency
on the part of learned Advocate in assisting the learned
Judge.
We have noted the above submission of the appellant.
However, we are unable to entertain this appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal and the connected application
are dismissed without any order as to costs.
However, this will not prevent the appellant from
approaching the learned Single Judge by way of an
appropriate application if the appellant is entitled to do so in
law.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be
supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Arijit Banerjee, J.)
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!