Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3751 Cal
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2023
08.06.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.61 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION Ct.No.34 dc.
C.R.R. 2032 of 2023
In the matter of : Sanjay Bansal ... Petitioner.
Mr. K. C. Garg, Ms. Sunita Agarwal ... For the Petitioner.
The petitioner is aggrieved by the manner in which the
long delay of preferring an appeal against an order of
conviction has been condoned by the learned Chief Judge,
City Sessions Court.
I find from the records that the substantial grievance of
the petitioner is not unjustified. However, the next date has
been fixed on 20.06.2023 for consideration of the stay
application of the appellant. I direct that in case, the learned
appellate court decides to stay the judgment and order of
conviction and sentence passed by the learned trial court, in
that case, the learned appellate court would pass a direction
for depositing an amount of 50% of the compensation amount
decided by the learned trial court to be deposited with the
trial court during the pendency of the appeal.
The complainant/petitioner would be at liberty to
exercise his power as enshrined under the provisions of the
Negotiable Instruments Act.
No adjournment should be granted on 20.06.2023 to
the appellant and the appeal must be heard at the earliest.
With the aforesaid observations, the revisional
application being CRR 2032 of 2023 is disposed of.
Pending connected application, if any, is consequently
disposed of.
All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of
this order duly downloaded from the official website of this
Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all
requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!