Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1317 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 8 June, 2023
OCD-7
AP/327/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
(Commercial Division)
RASHMI CEMENT LIMITED
Versus
RADHA BHATTAD
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
Date : June 8, 2023.
Appearance:
Mr. Soumabho Ghosh, Adv.
Mr. Sidhartha Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Rishav Dutt, Adv.
Mr. Aman Kataruka, Adv.
Mr. Dyutimoy Paul, Adv.
Mr. Souryadip Panda, Adv.
The Court: Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
respondent in the application filed under Section 11 of the 1996 Act. Counsel
have argued primarily on the point whether the petitioner, as the buyer would
have to first invoke the provisions of The MSME Act, 2006 under Section 18(1) of
the said Act. The other point is whether the arbitration agreement (the service
contract in the present case) at all exists in light of the respondent allegedly not
acknowledging the same in exchange of letters/correspondence.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent seeks to rely on Section
7(3)(b) of the 1996 Act in this context.
Lit this matter on 21st June, 2023 under the heading "For Judgment".
(MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J.) bp.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!