Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Sudipa Singha Roy vs Sri Subhamaya Singha
2023 Latest Caselaw 217 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 217 Cal
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Smt. Sudipa Singha Roy vs Sri Subhamaya Singha on 9 January, 2023

9.1.2023

Ct. no. 652 sb C.O. 3161 of 2022

Smt. Sudipa Singha Roy Vs.

Sri Subhamaya Singha

Mr. Aninda Lahiri Mr. Manas Malakar ...for the petitioner

Mr. Avinaba Patra Mr. Partha Sarathi Das Ms. Souraja De ...for the opposite party

Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is taken

on record.

This is an application under Section 24 of the Code

of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of the Matrimonial

suit no. 2 of 2022 presently pending before the court of

learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, 3rd

Court, Malda to the court of learned Additional District

Judge, Barrackpore, North 24 parganas.

The petitioner contended that the petitioner is the

wife of the opposite party and their marriage was

solemnised according to the Hindu rites and customs on

5.1.2022. The petitioner further allged that since she

was driven out and abandoned by the opposite party in

the year 2015, she is presently residing with her father's

house at Belgharia, North 24 parganas. The petitioner

further submits that they are blessed with a female child

who is now aged about 7 years and pursuing her studies

at a local school. She further submits that she is facing

tremendous difficulties to contest the suit at Malda

which is at a distance of about 400 kilometres from the

petitioner's place of residence. She further alleged that

on 26.7.2022 when the petitioner reached Malda to

attend the said court, she was obstructed and wrongfully

restrained by the opposite party along with his

associates and against such illegal activities on the part

of the opposite party, the petitioner rushed to the nearest

Englishbazar Police Station on the same day and duly

reported the matter and lodged written complaint. In

view of the facts of the case, the petitioner is very much

frightened and afraid of that opposite party and his

associates and accordingly, she has prayed for aforesaid

transfer.

The petitioner in this context, has relied upon two

judgments, one Susmita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay

reported in AIR 2002 SC 396 and another Ms.

Shakuntala Modi Vs. Om Prakash Bharuka reported in

(1991) 2 SCC 706 and contended that the wife's

convenience must be looked at while disposing of such

application for transfer.

Learned counsel for the opposite party submits

that he has specific instruction that the petitioner is not

an unemployed lady. He further submits that even if this

court pleases to transfer the said proceeding, it may be

transferred in a place which would be almost in an equal

distance from the residence of both the parties.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of

the case and that distance in between the two places is

about 400 kilometres and that the petitioner is the

custodian of a female child who is school going and that

in such cases, where the husband has filed a suit for

dissolution of marriage, the convenience of the petitioner

is of paramount importance and wife's convenience must

be looked at while considering such prayer and also

considering the distance which is an important factor for

both the parties, C.O. 3161 of 2022 is disposed of with a

direction upon the learned District Judge, Malda to

withdraw the matrimonial suit no. 2 of 2022 presently

pending before the court of learned Additional District

Judge, Fast Track Court, 3rd Court, Malda and to

transmit the same to the court of learned District Judge,

Nadia at Krishnagar within a period of three weeks from

the date of communication of the order, who in turn will

transfer the same to the court of learned Additional

District Judge, Ranaghat having jurisdiction to try the

suit within a period of three weeks thereafter.

The transferee court shall serve fresh notice upon

both the parties intimating the next date of hearing

before proceeding further with the aforesaid suit.

The department is directed to send a copy of the

order to the learned District Judge, Nadia at Krishnagar

and learned District Judge, Malda.

Accordingly, C.O. 3161 of 2022 is disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly

applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all

requisite formalities.

(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter