Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 21 Cal
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2023
1 03 02.01.2023
RVW 77 of 2022
AN M/s. Narsi & Associates vs.
Deputy Commissioner, Central Audit & ors.
in
WPTT 5 of 2020
Narsiram Dularam Kularia vs.
Deputy Commissioner, Central Audit Unit-II, Salt Lake & ors.
Mr. Vinay Kr. Shraff Miss Priya Sarah Paul Miss Priyanka Sharma ... for the petitioner
Mr. A. Ray Md. T. M. Siddiqui Mr. D. Ghosh ... for the State
We have heard learned counsel for both the
parties.
This application has been filed to review the
judgment and order dated 18.04.2022. After we have heard
elaborately Mr. Shraff, learned counsel for the petitioner, we
find that the points which are sought to be canvassed, if to
be considered in a review application, will tantamount to
rehearing the matter which is impermissible in exercise of
review jurisdiction. That apart, the settled legal position is
that the review is not an appeal in disguise, hence, we are of
the view that there is no error which is apparent on the face
of the judgment for us to exercise jurisdiction.
In the result, the application for review stands
dismissed.
(T. S. Sivagnanam, J.)
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!