Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1241 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2023
W.P.A. 6505 of 2015
10 17.02.2023
rkd Ct.15
Shibani Samui (Pal)
-vs-
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Samiran Mandal,
Mr. S. C. Dhara,
Mr. Abhinaba Dan,
Mr. Nitish Samanta
....for the petitioner.
Mr. Avishek Prasad
....for the State.
Question arises for consideration in this
writ petition is whether a married daughter on the
death of her mother is entitled to get appointment
on compassionate ground or on mere consideration
of fact that the applicant seeking appointment on
compassionate ground was married at the time of
death of her mother is not entitled to be considered
for such appointment.
Petitioner is the only daughter of one
Sushama Samui who died in harness on 10th
November, 2007 while working as Class-IV staff of
a Government recognized high school in the district
of Bankura. After death of petitioner's mother on
10th November, 2007 petitioner applied for
appointment on compassionate ground and it was
specifically submitted before the District Inspector
of Schools (S.E.), Bankura being respondent no.3
that petitioner is the only daughter of the deceased
Class-IV staff and after the death of father of the
petitioner she was looking after her mother.
The application of the petitioner was
processed by the office of the District Inspector of
Schools but no decision was taken whether to grant
compassionate appointment in favour of the
petitioner which prompted the petitioner to file writ
petition being WPA 1223 of 2012 claiming the
benefit of compassionate appointment. The said
writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 14th
February, 2013 by a coordinate Bench thereby
directing the respondent no.3 to take decision on
the entitlement of the petitioner to be appointed on
compassionate ground within a specified time.
In terms of the said direction of the
coordinate Bench as contained in order dated 14th
February, 2013 the respondent no.3 took decision
by issuing memo dated 7th February, 2014 whereby
the claim of the petitioner for appointment on
compassionate ground was rejected on the sole
ground that at the time of death of the mother of
the petitioner, she was married.
Such decision of the respondent no.3 dated
7th February, 2014 is subject matter of challenge in
the present writ petition.
This Court has heard the learned advocates
representing the petitioner and the State
respondents.
Mr. Prasad, learned advocate has defended
the decision of the respondent no.3 dated 7th
February, 2014 and submitted that since the
petitioner at the time of death of her mother was
married there was no scope left open to the
respondent no.3 to take decision otherwise than to
reject the prayer of the petitioner for grant of
appointment on compassionate ground.
After considering the contentions made on
behalf of the respective parties and on perusal of
the decision of the respondent no.3 it appears that
there is substance in the argument made on behalf
of the petitioner that the respondent no.3 upon
finding the petitioner was a married daughter on
the date of death of her mother on 10th November,
2007 rejected the prayer of the petitioner to grant
appointment on compassionate ground.
Mr. Mandal, learned advocate representing
the petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the
Special Bench dated 13th September, 2017 passed
in FMA 1277 of 2015 (The State of West Bengal
& Ors.-vs- Purnima Das & Ors.).
On perusal of the judgment of the Special
Bench, it appears that the issue has been set at
rest by the Special Bench. It has been succinctly
decided by the Special Bench that on the death of
the deceased employee while in service his/her
married daughter must succeed in her claim being
entirely dependant on the earnings of her
father/mother and agree to look after the other
family members of the deceased provided need for
compassionate appointment is established in terms
of the laid down formula.
In view of the judgment of the Special
Bench dated 13th September, 2017 the decision of
the respondent no.3 as contained in memo dated
7th February, 2014 stands set aside.
The respondent no.3 is directed to take
decision afresh in accordance with law and
appropriate Government notification governing the
claim for appointment on compassionate ground in
case of death of non-teaching staff working in
Government aided recognized school after granting
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner or her
representative within a period of twelve weeks from
the date of communication of this order.
While taking decision the respondent no.3
shall take into consideration the judgment
delivered by the Special Bench dated 13th
September, 2017 in Purnima Das (supra).
The decision to be taken by the respondent
no.3 shall be communicated to the petitioner within
two weeks thereafter.
With the aforesaid direction, the writ
petition stands disposed of.
However, there shall be no order as to
costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this
order, if applied for, be given to the learned
Advocates for the parties on the usual
undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!