Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1132 Cal
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023
10.2.2023
Sl. No. 15
Ct No. 654
Samarpita
FMAT 197 of 2019
IA.CAN 1 of 2019
(Old no. CAN 7510 of 2019)
Sir Sandip Kumar Sinha
Vs.
The NICL & Anr.
Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy....... Appellant
Mr. Saswata Bhattacharyya......... respondent
CAN 1 of 2019(Old no. CAN 7510 of 2019)
This is an application for condonation of
delay in preferring the appeal.
Mr. Amit Ranjan Roy, learned Advocate for
appellant-claimant submits that due to the injuries
and medical treatment of the injured, there has been
delay of 59 days in preferring the appeal and he
seeks the condonation of such delay.
Mr. Saswata Bhattacharyya, learned
Advocate opposes such prayer for condonation of
delay.
As per report of Additional Stamp Reporter
dated 19th February 2019 there is delay of 59 days
in preferring the appeal. Bearing in mind beneficial
piece of legislation and the cause shown, I am
inclined to condone the delay of 59 days in
preferring the appeal. Accordingly, such delay, in
preferring the appeal is condoned.
The application being CAN 1 of 2019 (Old
no. CAN 7510 of 2019) is disposed of
The appeal is formerly admitted and
registered.
FMAT 197 of 2019
This appeal is preferred against the
judgment and award dated 14th September, 2018
passed by Learned Additional District Judge-cum-
Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track,
1st Court, Howrah, in M.A.C. Case No. 232 of 2015
under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Mr Amit Ranjan Roy, learned Advocate for
appellant-claimant submits that all the relevant
papers are with him and as such calling lower court
records be dispensed with at present. In view of
such submissions, calling for lower court records is
dispensed with for the time being.
Mr Roy, learned Advocate for appellant-
claimant undertakes to prepare informal paper
books. Accordingly, learned advocate for appellants-
claimant is directed to prepare and file requisite
numbers of informal paper books incorporating all
papers and documents including pleadings and
evidence both, oral and documentary, in printed or
cyclostyle or type written form within a period of
four weeks from date.
Mr Roy, learned Advocate for appellants-
claimants submits for dispensing with service of
notice of appeal upon respondent no. 2-Owner of the
offending vehicle, since he did not contest the claim
application. It appears from the impugned judgment
that the case has been dismissed on contest against
respondent no.2-owner of offending vehicle.
Accordingly, appellant-claimant is directed to
deposit talabana cost along with written up notice
form for service of notice of appeal upon respondent
No. 2 owner of the offending vehicle within a period
of two weeks from the date.
Since respondent no. 1-insurance company
has already entered appearance, hence, service of
notice of appeal upon the said respondent is
dispensed with.
Let the matter appear in the Combined
Monthly List of March, 2023 under the heading
"Hearing".
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!