Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5632 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2023
28.08.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ct. no.654 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Sl. Nos.54
sn ,,
F.M.A.T.923 of 2018
CAN 1 of 2019(Old CAN 5124/2019)
,
Purnima Roy & Ors.
Vs.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
,,
Mr. Saidur Rahaman
... for the appellants-claimants
Ms. Sayanti Santra
..for the respondent no.1-insurance co.
Let affidavit of service filed on behalf of the
appellants-claimants is taken on record.
In Re: CAN 1 of 2019 (Old CAN 5124 of 2019)
This is an application for condonation of delay in
preferring the appeal.
Mr. Saidur Rahaman, learned advocate for the
appellants-claimants submits that there is nominal delay
of two days in preferring the appeal. He seeks for
condonation of such delay.
Ms. Sayanti Santra, learned advocate for the
respondent no.1-insurance company does not raise any
objection.
As per report of the Additional Stamp Reporter
dated 17th January, 2019, there is delay of 2 days in
preferring the appeal.
The cause shown is sufficient to condone delay of
two days in preferring the appeal. Accordingly, such delay
in preferring the appeal stands condoned.
The application being C.A.N. 1 of 2019 (Old CAN
5124 of 2019) stands disposed of.
Accordingly, the appeal is formally admitted and
registered.
In Re: F.M.A.T. 923 of 2018
This appeal is preferred against the judgment and
award dated 31st May, 2018 passed by the learned Judge,
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 1st Court, Jalpaiguri, in
M.A.C. Case No.120 of 2015 under Section 166 of the
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Mr. Rahaman, learned advocate for the appellants-
claimants submits that all the relevant papers are with
him and as such, calling for the lower court records be
dispensed with. He undertakes to prepare informal paper
books. Accordingly, calling for the lower court records
stands dispensed with for the time being.
Learned advocate for the appellants-claimants is
directed to prepare and file requisite numbers of informal
paper books incorporating all relevant papers and
documents including pleading and evidence both, oral
and documentary, in printed, typewritten or cyclostyled
form, within a period of four weeks from date.
Mr. Rahaman, learned advocate for the appellants-
claimants submits for dispensing with service of notice of
appeal upon the respondent no.2, owner of the offending
vehicle, since he did not contest the claim application. It
is found from the impugned judgment and award that the
respondent no.2 did not contest the claim application and
the case has been disposed of ex-parte. In the aforesaid
backdrop, service of notice of appeal upon the respondent
no.2 stands dispensed with.
Since the respondent no.1, insurance company has
already entered appearance, service of notice of appeal
upon the said respondent also stands dispensed with.
Let the matter appear after four weeks under the
heading "Hearing".
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!