Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5557 Cal
Judgement Date : 24 August, 2023
24.08.2023 Sl. No. 01.
Suman Ct.No.42.
WPA 5910 of 2005
Madan Mohan Hudati and Ors.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal and Ors.
Mr. Rabindranath Mahato Mr. Satyendra Agarwal Mr. Animesh Paul ..for the petitioners
After delivery of judgment the instant matter is
listed under the heading "To Be Mentioned" at the
instance of the petitioner. It is pointed out by the
learned advocate for the petitioner that there are
some typographical errors in the judgment. I also
find the said typographical errors which has not been
corrected in the judgment delivered on 17 th August,
2023. For example, the spelling of the name of the
advocate on record was wrongly recorded, secondly,
the institution year of L.A. Case No. 9 (Act-II) of
1981-82 has been recorded as 1982-81. In some
places Section 9 (3B) of the Land Acquisition West
Bengal Amendment Act was recorded as 9(3b),
bracketed portion of number of Section 9 (3B) was
improperly recorded, in page 8 of the judgment
instead of sub-section section has been recorded,
one of the L.A. Case No. has not been mentioned in
paragraph 10 of the judgment, the word "effect" is
wrongly recorded as "affect".
These are absolutely typographical errors
which lost sight of the Court at the time of correction
of the judgment before delivery. Therefore, this
Court is of the opinion that the above typographical
errors are to be rectified in the judgment itself. The
corrected judgment shall be kept with the record and
the same will be uploaded in the server deleting the
old judgment dated 17th August, 2023 where such
typographical errors have cropped up.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!