Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5027 Cal
Judgement Date : 14 August, 2023
08 14.8.2023 MAT 96 of 2017
Ct-08 with
I.A No. CAN 1 of 2017(Old CAN No. 824 of 2017)
Minhaj Uddin Molla
Vs.
ar State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Ekramul Bari
Sk. Imtiaj Uddin
... For the Appellant
1.
We have heard the learned counsel
appearing for the appellant. We have considered
the judgment impugned.
2. It appears that the School Service
Commission has acknowledged that
appointments given to three different persons
were done wrongly and in violation of regulation.
The petitioner is similarly situated and
circumstanced as that of those three persons.
We are in agreement with the observation made
by the learned Single Judge that since the three
persons were given appointment wrongly, the
petitioner cannot be considered for such
appointment on the ground of negative equality.
It is well established that the equality clause
enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution is a
positive concept and cannot be applied in the
negative. (Mangalam Organics Ltd. Vs. Union
of India (UOI) reported in 2017 (7) SCC 221)
3. On such consideration, the appeal being
MAT 96 of 2017 is accordingly dismissed.
15. In view of dismissal of the appeal
nothing remains to be decided in the application
for stay being CAN 824 of 2017 and the same is
accordingly dismissed.
16. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this
order, if applied for, be given to the parties on
usual undertaking.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!