Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4822 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2023
Item No. 391 07.08.2023
GB C.O. 1970 of 2023
Sri Samir Konai Vs.
Sri Nitya Gopal Konai & Anr.
Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee, Mr. Souvik Das, Mr. K.R. Ahmed, Mr. Rudranil Das ... for the Petitioner.
The revisional application is formally admitted.
This Court, prima facie, finds that the order dated
December 16, 2022 passed by the learned Additional District
Judge, Fast Track 1st Court at Kandi, District - Murshidabad
in Misc. Appeal No.12 of 2011, suffers from an error.
The learned court below held that partial preemption
ought not to be allowed, although it appears from the records
that preemption was claimed in respect of two separate and
demarcated plots which were sold by one deed. The
petitioner had claimed for preemption in respect of both.
The learned trial judge rejected the preemption
application in respect of one plot on the ground of lack of
evidence with regard to the longest boundary of the
preemptor, but the preemption in respect of the other plot
was allowed.
Prima facie, it appears that the preemption
application was not filed claiming partial preemption.
Let this matter appear in the monthly list of
November 2023 under the heading 'Urgent Top'.
The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this
revisional application along with a server copy of this order
upon the opposite parties as also upon the learned advocate
appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. Affidavit-of-
service to be filed on the next date.
Status quo with regard to nature, character and
possession of the plot of land in respect of which preemption
was permitted by the learned trial judge, be maintained till
December 31, 2022 or until further orders, whichever is
earlier.
Certified copy of the judgment is taken on record.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!