Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1983 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2023
IA No. ACO 1 of 2023 APOT No. 251 of 2023 with CP No. 269 of 1968 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA In appeal from its ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Raj Kumar & Co. Pvt. Ltd. (In Liqn.) And Ganges Rolling Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Versus The Official Liquidator, High Court, Calcutta
Before:
The Hon'ble Justice I. P. MUKERJI And The Hon'ble Justice PRASENJIT BISWAS Date: 10th August 2023
Appearance:
Mr. Abhrajit Mitra, Sr. Advocate Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Sushovit Dutt Majumder, Advocate Mr. Sarosij Dasgupta, Advocate Mr. Souvik Ganguly, Advocate Mr. Biswaroop Mukherjee, Advocate for the appellant Mr. Pramod Kr. Drolia, Advocate for Official Liquidator
The Court: We formally admit the appeal.
Since all the parties who matter are before the court, we are in
a position to dispose of this appeal dispensing with all formalities.
As back as on 21st May 1970, the company Raj Kumar &
Company Private Limited was directed to be wound up by an order of
this court. At the time of winding up of the company, it was the owner
of an undivided half share in each of the premises 232, 232/2, 235,
237, 239, 242, 243 and 244, Picnic Garden Road, Kolkata. The
remaining half share was owned by Hargobind Prasad Goenka as
Karta of a Hindu Undivided Family.
It appears that the entire property at Picnic Garden was sold
to Ganges Rolling Industries Private Limited for Rs. 57,50,000/-. The
learned judge notes in the impugned judgement and order that it was
the obligation of Ganges to pay the entire sale proceeds and that an
amount of Rs. 17,25,000/- remained due and payable by them. The
learned judge went on to opine that failure on the part of the
purchaser to pay the entire sum rendered the sale a nullity. By his
judgment and order dated 28th July 2023 the learned judge declared
the sale to be invalid. This necessarily has the consequence of the
applicant/purchaser having to return the property to the Official
Liquidator after having paid a considerable amount.
We do not know how much of the money paid by the
purchaser could be got back, inasmuch as, the winding up order was
passed more than 30 years ago and the records are not before us to
show how this purchase money was dealt with. In fact, the cause of
utter surprise for the petitioner is that by the present application the
applicant had only wanted leave of court to deposit the balance sum of
Rs.17,25,000/-.
We are also informed by learned counsel that as of now the
winding up of the company is stayed.
We have fully and properly made ourselves acquainted with
the entire facts and circumstances of this case. We are of the view that
the applicant should be given an opportunity to perfect the sale by
paying Rs. 17,25,000/- to the Official Liquidator as balance price and
an additional sum of Rs. 2,75,000/- representing interest.
If the above sums are paid by 15th September 2023 the Official
Liquidator shall accept the same and deposit it in the account where
the sale proceeds of the assets of the company have been deposited.
The property will stand permanently detached from the properties
constituting the assets of the company (in liqn.). The sale in favour of
the purchaser would stand absolute.
Order also in terms of prayers (c) and (d) of the Judge's
Summons.
The impugned judgment and order dated 28th July 2023 is set
aside.
We have not been addressed ourselves any other case with
regard to winding up of Raj Kumar & Co. Private Limited.
The appeal and the application are allowed to the above
extent.
As affidavits were not invited, allegations contained in the stay
petition are deemed to have been not admitted.
(I. P. MUKERJI, J.)
(PRASENJIT BISWAS, J.)
R. Bose
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!