Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pradip Prasad vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 2687 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2687 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Pradip Prasad vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 19 April, 2023
                     IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                      Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                Appellate Side



Present:

The Hon'ble Justice Jay Sengupta



                            WPA 21631 of 2022
                               Pradip Prasad
                                    Versus
                      The State of West Bengal & Ors.


For the petitioner             :     Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy
                                     Mr. Pingal Bhattacharyya
                                                            .....Advocates
For the State                   :    Mr. Susovan Sengupta
                                     Mr. Subir Pal
                                                            .....Advocates


Heard lastly on                 :    19.01.2023

Judgment on                     :    19.04.2023

Jay Sengupta, J.:

1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

praying for direction upon the respondent authorities to cancel and

withdraw the vacancy declaration notice dated 27.04.2022 issued by the

Sub-Divisional Control (F&S) Gangarampur for Sahapara (Barabajar), Ward

No. 7, Post Office and Police Station Gangarampur, Dakshin Dinajpur.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted as

follows. On 11.03.2020 a vacancy notification was published in respect of a

fair price shop at Sahapara (Barabajar), Ward No. 7, Post Office and Police

Station Gangarampur, District Dakshin Dinajpur. The petitioner applied for

such dealership. An enquiry was held. Later on, the petitioner came to learn

that the earlier notification was withdrawn and a fresh notification was

issued. The declaration of fresh vacancy on 27.04.2022 was without any

Gazette notification. On this, reliance was placed on Barun Ghosh versus

Goutam Kumar Saha, 2011 SCC Online Cal 2977. Nor was the second

notification published in widely circulated newspapers as required. A

reference was made to Clause 20 of the West Bengal Public Distribution

System (Maintenance and Control) Order, 2013 as amended. Besides, the

petitioner was quite eligible for the said dealership and there was no reason

why his candidature was purportedly rejected.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State submitted as

follows. The respondent authorities had ample powers to renotify a vacancy.

The resultant vacancy in question was generated due to the surrender by

the erstwhile dealer Girinath Roy of his dealership in 2008. Consequently, a

notification for vacancy declaration was issued. Inquiry was conducted. But,

it appeared from the enquiry report that no applicant was found suitable.

Hence, a proposal was sent for renotification, which was approved.

Thereafter, the Sub-Divisional Control (F&S), Ganganagar renotified the

vacancy vide notification no. 275/MR/SCFS/GMP dated 27.04.2022. Not

only was the renotification displayed on the office notice board, but the

same was also published in renowned daily newspapers namely, the 'Aajkal'

and 'The Telegraph' on 28.05.2022. The said notification dated 27.04.2022

was also made also available in the Department's website for the prescribed

period of application from 28.05.2022 to 18.06.2022. That was all that was

required for renotifying a vacancy for a dealership. Quite significantly, the

petitioner had chosen not to file an affidavit-in-reply.

4. I heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the writ

petition and the affidavit in opposition.

5. For a proper adjudication of the present lis, it is important to refer to

the provision amending Clause 20 of the West Bengal Public Distribution

System (Maintenance and Control), 2013.

"(1) In clause 20, -

(a) for sub-clause(ii), substitute the following sub-clauses: -

"(ii) If it appears necessary for the District Admininstation to declare

a new vacancy of dealer for catering to the need of consumers in any

particular area, the vacancy has to be declared with the approval of the

State Government. In that case the concerned Sub-Divisional Controller,

Food and Supplies, who, in turn, shall send the same to the Director. The

Director shall examine the proposal. If necessary, make re-enquiry and send

the proposal to the Department for approval.

(ii) After obtaining the approval of the State Government, the Sub-

Divisional Controller, Food & Supplies shall declare such vacancy stating

the eligibility criteria through notice in the office notice board and publish

the same in the Official Gazette. The Sub-divisional Controller, Food and

Supplies shall simultaneously publish an indicative advertisement of the

said vacancy for information to the General Public in at least one Bengali

newspaper and one English newspaper having State-wise circulation.

Provided that in case of re-notification of any vacancy on account of non-

availability of suitable candidates against such vacancy, the concerned

SCF& S shall publish the same with the approval of the concerned District

Magistrate under intimate to the State Government."

6. Thus, it is evident that in case a fresh vacancy is to be declared, a

notice has to be given in the office notice board, in the Official Gazette as

also advertised in at least one Bengali and one English newspaper having

State-wide circulation. The next portion deals with the case of renotification

of vacancy on account of non-availability of suitable candidates. There, the

term used is 'shall publish' the same.

7. Although the mode of publication has been specifically delineated in

case of a fresh vacancy, in the following portion dealing with the

renotification of vacancy the specific modes have not been mentioned in

clear terms. However, for a logical and harmonious construction, one has to

ascribe to the word 'published' the same meaning and mode as contained in

the main portion of the sub-clause. Otherwise, it would be left to diverse

interpretations as to what mode of publication should be included and what

be excluded.

8. Moreover, a notification in the present context of Government largesse

would quite obviously connote a public notification and a public notification

has been defined in Article 366(19) of the Constitution of India to mean a

notification in the Gazette of India or in the official Gazette of the State.

9. In Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress Versus State of Madhya

Pradesh 2011(5) SCC 29 and in Barun Ghosh (supra), strong emphasis had

been laid on the requirement of publication in the Official Gazette in matters

of Government largesse.

10. In the present case, admittedly the vacancy notification was displayed

in the office notice board, was uploaded in the official webside of the

Department and was published in two widely circulated newspapers, one

English and the other one vernacular. But, the same was evidently not

published in the official Gazette.

11. A mere substantial compliance would not suffice when the provisions

relate to publication of notice in respect of public employment or

engagement or Government largesse. In such matters, one has to follow the

best practices of transparency and adequate dissemination of information

and act strictly in terms of what law provides.

12. In view of the above discussions, this Court has no hesitation to hold

that even for renotification of a vacancy in terms of the provisions of the

Control Order of 2013, a Gazette notification is a mandatory requirement.

13. Therefore, the vacancy declaration notice dated 27.04.2022 issued by

Sub-Divisional Control Order, Gangarampur and all consequential steps

taken in this regard by the respondent authorities are quashed and set

aside.

14. The respondent authorities shall be at liberty to renotify the vacancy

in accordance with law.

15. With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of. However,

there shall be no order as to costs.

16. Urgent photostat certified copies of this judgment may be delivered to

the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all

formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)

S.M

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter