Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2471 Cal
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2023
22 11.04.2023
mb
W.P.A. No. 4153 of 2015
Unmesh Properties Private Limited & Anr.
Vs.
State Bank of India & Ors.
Mr. Sandip Kumar De, Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Mr. Abhik Chitta Kundu, Mr. Souvik Sana ...for the petitioners
Mr. Debashis Saha ...for the State Bank of India
The limited point involved in the present writ
petition is whether the State Bank of India, as a
custodian of the property purchased by the
petitioners from the Union of India, was liable to
pay the entire amount of municipal taxes in respect
of the property, till purchase of the property by the
petitioners.
It is seen from the records that the petitioners
rely on certain documents to indicate that the State
Bank of India repeatedly assured that it would clear
all the amounts of municipal taxes in that regard.
However, the State Bank of India, through
counsel, is now taking a stand that the State Bank
of India only functioned in the capacity of a
custodian of the property for a limited period, as an
agent of the Union of India, and even as per the
deed executed in favour of the petitioners, it is the
vendor (Union of India), who is liable to pay the
amount-in-question to the petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Judgment is reserved in the matter.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!