Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sumit Kumar Sen vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 2282 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2282 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Sumit Kumar Sen vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 4 April, 2023
04.04.2023
Item No.12
Court No.6.
    S. De
                                 M.A.T. 92 of 2023
                                        with
                              I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2023

                                Sumit Kumar Sen.
                                        Vs
                          The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                    Mr. Soumya Majumder,
                    Ms. Sanjukta Dutta,
                                      ...for the appellant.
                    Mr. Swapan Kr. Mazumder,
                    Mr. Saptarshi Mazumder,
                               ...for the Nabadwip Municipality.
                    Mr. Jahar Lal De,
                    Mr. Rudranil De,
                                      ...for the State.


                    By consent of the parties the appeal and the

              connected application are taken up together for

              hearing.

                    The    appellant   retired   from   the   service   of

              Nabadwip Municipality on March 31, 2019. With the

              grievance that his retiral benefits were wrongfully

              withheld, he had approached a learned single Judge of

              this Court by filing WPA No.6091 of 2020. That writ

              petition was disposed of by directing the State

              respondents to disburse the pensionary benefits of the

appellant/writ petitioner within six weeks from the

date of the order.

Pension Payment Order was issued in favour of

the appellant herein. However, according to the

appellant, although he is entitled to the benefit of pay

revision under Revision of Pay and Allowances 2019

(ROPA 2019), his pensionary benefits have not been

calculated taking into consideration the pay revision

under ROPA 2019. With this grievance, he

approached the learned single Judge in the present

round of litigation. By the judgment and order

impugned in this appeal, the learned single Judge

directed the Chairman of the Nabadwip Municipality to

consider the appellant's entitlement to the benefit of

ROPA 2019 and if the Chairman found the appellant

to be so entitled, then to release the applicable benefits

in his favour.

Being aggrieved, the writ petitioner has come up

by way of this appeal.

Mr. Mazumder, learned advocate appearing for

the appellant/writ petitioner says that since the

Municipality has denied the benefit under ROPA 2019

to the appellant, it would be an exercise in futility to

have the matter heard before the Chairman of the

Municipality. Obviously, the Chairman will not

deviate from the earlier decision of the Municipality.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned advocate for the Municipality, on

instructions says that the appellant is not entitled to

the benefit under ROPA 2019. The PPO was issued in

November 2020 after taking into account all benefits

that the appellant is entitled to.

Mr. Mazumder, learned advocate appearing for

the appellant has drawn our attention to a

Government of West Bengal Resolution dated

December 26, 2019 (Page 16 of affidavit-in-opposition

of the Municipality). The material portion of the

Resolution is set out hereunder :-

"In Finance Department Resolution No.8071-F(P) dated the 27th November, 2015 the Government constituted a Pay Commission to examine the present structure of pay and conditions of service of the employees of Municipalities. Municipal Corporations, Notified Area authorities and Industrial Township Authorities after taking into account the prevailing pay structure under the Central Government, Public Sector Undertakings, other State Governments etc., and to furnish recommendations for changes which may be desirable and feasible. The Commission has submitted its report on the 13th September, 2019.

After careful consideration of the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission, the Governor has been pleased to decide that the structure of pay and other conditions of service in respect of the employees of the Municipalities including Notified Area Authorities and Industrial Township

Authorities will be as set out in the following paragraphs.

1. Date of effect - The revised pay structure under this resolution shall be deemed to have come into force on the first day of January 2016 notionally with actual financial effect from 01.01.2020."

Admittedly, the appellant superannuated on

March 31, 2019. The effect of the aforesaid resolution,

in our considered opinion, is that the pensionary

benefits of the appellant will have to be calculated by

allowing notional revision of scale of pay of the

appellant under ROPA 2019. This is because the

revised pay structure under the resolution shall be

deemed to have come into force on January 1, 2016

and the appellant retired thereafter. No doubt that the

appellant will not be entitled to actual financial

benefit, in the sense that he will not be entitled to

arrears on the basis of the notional revision of scale of

pay. However, the respondents have erred in

calculating the appellant's pensionary benefits without

allowing for notional revision of his scale of pay under

ROPA 2019.

Accordingly, the order under appeal is set aside.

We direct the Municipality to follow the procedure

enumerated in Rules 3, 4 and 5 of the West Bengal

Employees (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefit) Rules,

2003 and calculate the applicable pensionary benefits

of the appellant after allowing for notional revision of

his scale of pay under ROPA 2019. Once the

procedure prescribed in Rules 3, 4 and 5 in 2003

Rules is completed and the relevant records are sent to

the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group

Insurance, which will be done within six weeks from

the date of communication of this order to the

concerned authority, the Director of Pension, Provident

Fund and Group Insurance shall issue fresh Pension

Payment Order within six weeks thereafter. Needless

to say that the actual disbursement of the benefits

under fresh PPO shall be made by the concerned

authority within four weeks of issuance of the Pension

Payment Order.

The applicable medical allowance and ad hoc

payment which the appellant may be entitled to shall

also be released in his favour within a period of eight

weeks from the date of communication of this order to

the concerned authority, after adjusting all payments

already made to the appellant.

Accordingly, MAT 92 of 2023 is disposed of

along with the application being I.A. No. CAN 1 of

2023.

Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if

applied for, shall be given to the parties as

expeditiously as possible on compliance with all the

necessary formalities.

(Prasenjit Biswas, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter