Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2256 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 April, 2023
In the High Court at Calcutta
(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)
Appellate side
C
S/L No. 37
C.O. 357 of 2023
03.04.2023
Ct-237 o
(RD) Tamalika Mazumder & Ors.
u
Vs.
r Indrani Dey & Anr.
t
Mr. Ivan Roy, Adv.
N
Mr. Nirupam Dutta, Adv.
. Mr. Sk. Abdur Rahim, Adv.
2
2
.... For the petitioner
S
Mr. Apurba Kr. Ghosh , Adv.
l Mr. Rudranil Ghosh, Adv
1
... For the Respondent 1.
/ This revision application filed assailing the order C dated 19.11.2022 as well as order dated 19.12.2022 in L connection with Misc. Case No. 17/1995 under Section
47 of the Civil Procedure Code, passed by the Learned
Civil Judge, 5th Court, Howrah.
From the order dated 19.11.2022 it appears
that Learned Judge fixed date for argument pursuant to
the direction of the Hon'ble Court in connection with CO
No. 1984 of 2022 whereby Hon'ble Court directed the
Learned Trial Court for fixing suitable date within two
weeks from date enabling the petitioners/judgments
debtors to adduce their witness as a special chance,
otherwise, the Trial Judge will proceed with the case.
On receipt of that order 19.11.2022 Learned Judge
took up the misc. Case. None appeared on behalf of the
opposite parties. Petitioner was present asking for fixing
date of argument.
Pursuant of the order of this Court learned Judge
rightly fixed date on 08.12.2022 for argument.
On behalf of the petitioner/judgment debtor two
applications were filed for re-calling the order dated
19.11.2022. On 19.12.2022 Learned Judge took up the
applications for re-calling the order dated 19.11.2022.
Learned Judge relying on the direction of the Hon'ble
Court in CO No. 1984 of 2022 refused to re-call the
order dated 19.11.2022.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
petitioners/judgement debtors assailed the order on the
ground of wrong address of the witness where summons
was served and on that ground on behalf of the
petitioners/judgement debtors prayer was made for
further opportunity for issuance of summons upon the
witness in the correct address.
I do not find any infirmity or irregularity in the
impugned orders passed in terms of the specific
direction of this Court.
Considering all facts and circumstances discussed
hereinabove, I am of the humble opinion that a final
opportunity should be given to the petitioner to produce
his witness within a week from the date of
communication of this order to the learned Trial Court
who is also requested to take evidence, if witness is
produce, and to dispose of the Misc. Case arose out of
section 47 of the Civil Procedure Code without giving
any further opportunity, whatsoever, to either of the
parties within one weeks thereafter.
With the aforesaid observation the revision
application being no. Co No. 357 of 2023 stand disposed
of, subject to payment of costs of Rs. 20,000/- to be
deposited with the high Court Legal services Authority.
All parties are directed to act on a server copy of this
order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all
requisite formalities.
(Bibhas Ranjan De)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!