Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7252 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 October, 2022
18.10.2022
Item No.4
Ct. No.17
AKG/S.A.
WPA 23202 of 2022
Ujjal Halder & Ors.
-vs-
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra,
Mr. Chittapriya Ghosh,
Ms. Komal Singh,
Mr. Somesh Ghosh
...for the petitioners
Mr. Santanu Mitra,
Mr. Samimul Bari,
Mr. Kapil Guha,
Mr. Jaladhi Das,
Mr. Somnath Naskar
...for the State
Mr. Subrata Santra
...for the Union of India
Mr. Saikat Banerjee
...for the Board of Primary Education
Mr. U. K. Jana
...for N.C.T.E.
The writ petitioners challenged a notification
dated September 29, 2022 issued by the West Bengal
Board of Primary Education for conducting the Teachers
Eligibility Test, 2022 (TET 2022) for Classes I to V.
Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra, learned senior counsel
appearing for the petitioners referring to the said
notification, annexure -P/1 to the writ petition submits
that, the eligibility criteria was fixed inter alia on the basis
of N.C.T.E (The National Council for Teachers Education)
notification dated August 25, 2010 read with June 28,
2018 and also read with October 13, 2021.
2
Learned senior counsel submitted that the, said
notification dated June 28, 2018 fixing the qualification of
a candidate having Graduation with at least 50% marks
and Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) stood set aside by a
Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Civil Writ
Petition No. 1853/2021 ( Rajendra Singh Chotiya & Anr.
-vs.- The National Council For Teachers Education &
Ors.) by its judgment and order dated November 25, 2021.
It is also submitted that, the said decision of the Division
Bench of the Rajasthan High Court is under challenge
before the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave
Petition ( C ) Nos. 20743 of 2021. Mr. Mitra submitted
that as of now, the said notification dated June 28, 2018
stands set aside by the Division Bench of the Rajasthan
High Court and as such, the intending candidates having
the qualification of Graduation with at least of 50% marks
and Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) are not eligible to
participate in the said TET-2022 Examination.
It is also submitted by Mr. Mitra that ad valorem
Court fees of this writ petition have already been paid.
Mr. Saikat Banerjee, learned counsel appearing for
the respondent nos. 8 and 9 submits that it is the
N.C.T.E., who should inform such fact to the respondent
nos. 8 & 9 and no such information has been received. In
absence of any such information, the respondent nos. 8 &
9 had rightly issued the said notification dated September
29, 2022. Such submission of Mr. Banerjee has been
disputed by Mr. Mitra. He submitted that the respondent
nos. 8 & 9 were aware of this fact in a previous writ
petition which is pending before this Court.
It is a fact that the said Special Leave Petition is
fixed on November 16, 2022.
Considering the rival submissions and the materials
on record, this Court makes it clear that all the steps
taken and to be taken in terms of the said notification
dated September 29, 2022, annexure-P/1 to the writ
petition shall abide by the result of the said pending
Special Leave Petition before the Hon'ble Supreme Court,
including the fate of the intending candidates, who are
covered by the said notification dated June 28, 2018.
With the above observations, this writ petition being
WPA 23202 of 2022 stands disposed of, without any
order as to costs.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!