Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2955 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 May, 2022
13 18.05.
AGM
/RKB
C.O. 1134 of 2022
Ct
07 Shri Bihariji Cold Rollers Private Limited & Ors.
Vs
State Bank of India & Ors.
Mr. Saptangshu Basu, Sr. Adv
Mr. Arijit Bardhan,
Mr. M. K. Gupta,
... For the petitioners.
Mr. Om Narayan Rai,
Mr. Debasish Chakraborty,
... For the opposite parties.
The subject matter of challenge in this
revisional application is against the judgment and
order dated 29th March, 2022, passed by the learned
Judge-in-Charge, Debts Recovery Tribunal -I, Kolkata
in S.A No. 205 of 2015.
Mr. Saptangshu Basu, learned senior advocate
for the petitioners/applicants submits that in the
court below, the matter was posted on 29th April,
2022, for an order in connection with an
interlocutory application, but suddenly, some times
in March, the entire proceeding has been dismissed
by the impugned judgment and order.
It is thus contended by Mr. Basu that there has
been error of jurisdiction committed by the Court
below in giving the decision of pending proceeding in
final form, keeping the interlocutory application
pending.
Mr. Basu, wants to prefer appeal or review, as
per his choice under the provisions of the law, so as
to challenge the order impugned in this case, and
proposes for granting some interim protection till the
date of filing such proposed application before the
Court concerned.
It is gathered knowledge from the submissions
disclosed by the learned advocate for the opposite
parties that three properties involved in the subject
under reference have already been sold, and some
other properties are yet to be sold.
Without going into the details, let there be an
order directing stay of operation of the impugned
judgment, dated 29th March, 2022 passed in S.A. No.
205 of 2015 of learned Judge-in-charge, Debts
Recovery Tribunal-I, Kolkata for a period of fifteen
(15) days from hence, simply to file the proposed
application, as per choice of petitioners, within such
time (15 days).
It is further clarified that if any such
application, as referred hereinbefore, is filed before
the Court concerned, with a prayer for stay, the same
may be decided afresh independently in accordance
with law, without being influenced by the order made
by this Court.
With this observation and direction, the
revisional application stands disposed of.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties on usual
undertakings.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!