Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2515 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 May, 2022
04.05.2022
SL No.18
Court No.8
(gc)
FMA 1011 of 2019
With
CAN 1 of 2019
(Old No: CAN 392 of 2019)
Arabinda Kumar Marik & Ors.
Vs.
Smt. Arati Ghosh (Prafulla Kr. Ghosh
Since Deceased) & Ors.
Ms. Shebatee Datta,
...for the Appellants.
Mr. Bhagbat Chaudhuri,
Mr. Biswajit Ghosh,
...for the Respondents.
By consent of the parties, the appeal and the
application are taken up together and disposed by this
common order.
The Appellate Court cannot dismiss the appeal on
merit in view of the Order 41 Rule 17(1) of the Code of
Civil Procedure. The Coordinate Bench on 28th August,
2019 also expressed similar view at the time of
admission of the appeal.
Under such circumstances, the judgment impugned
dated 4th September, 2018 is set aside. Misc. Case
No.25 of 2013 is restored.
We request the learned Additional District Judge,
1st Court, Howrah to dispose of Misc. Case No.25 of
2013 on merits after giving opportunity of hearing to the
parties as expeditiously as possible preferably within a
period of three months from the date of communication
of this order without granting any adjournment to either
of the parties unless it is avoidable and subject to the
convenience of the learned Court. We make it clear that
in the event either of the parties fail to appear, the Misc.
Case may be decided in absence of the other party.
Accordingly, the appeal being FMA 1011 of 2019
and the application being CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No: CAN
392 of 2019) stand disposed of.
However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties on usual
undertaking.
(Sugato Majumdar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!