Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1179 Cal
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2022
14th March, 2022 (D/L No.08) (SKB)
W.P.A. 3784 of 2022
Lakshman Chandra Poddar Versus The State of West Bengal and others
Mr. Satyaranjan Kundu ... for the petitioner.
Affidavit of service is kept on record.
The petitioner was an Associate Professor of Sree
Chaitanya College who retired from service on
28.02.2006. The first pension payment order was
issued on April 21, 2006. Under the ROPA Rules, 2009
there was revision of the pensionary and gratuity
amount payable to the petitioner. The revised pension
payment order was issued on July 26, 2011 and the
arrear pension was disbursed on September 24, 2011 in
terms of ROPA, 2009. The petitioner claims interest on
delayed payment of the revised arrear pension.
I have heard learned counsel for both parties and I
have considered the orders passed by this court in
similar facts. It is settled law that retired employee is
entitled to some amount of interest on delayed payment
of arrear pension.
There is a considerably delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating
that there is no statutory period of limitation and
neither parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the
submission of the petitioner that accordingly the
petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon
an order in W.P.17557(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra
Saha Vs. State of West Bengal and others) wherein a co-
ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court
judgment in the case of Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh
reported in (2008)8 SCC 648 on the issue of limitation
relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension
wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be
granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights
of the third party.
In view of the above, I direct the Director of
Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance,
Government of West Bengal as also the concerned
Treasury Officer to pay interest to the petitioner @ 8%
per annum on the revised arrear pension calculated on
and from June 1, 2009 till actual date of payment, that
is, September 24, 2011. Such payment is to be made
within a period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of without
any order as to costs.
Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations made
in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be made available to the parties upon
compliance with the requisite formalities.
(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!