Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3860 Cal
Judgement Date : 30 June, 2022
Form J(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
C.R.R. 1848 of 2022
Bibhas Dutta & Anr.
Vs.
State of West Bengal
For the petitioner : Mr. Allen Felix, Adv.
For the State : Ms. Anasuya Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Pinak Kr. Mitra, Adv.
Heard on : 30.06.2022
Judgment On : 30.06.2022.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
Affidavit-of-service be kept with the record.
The petitioner has challenged the legality, validity and
propriety of the order dated 18th September, 2021 where the learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katwa, Purba Burdwan issued
proclamation against 16 accused persons of whom Bibhas Dutta and
Amlan Chatterjee @ Johor are the petitioners.
Having heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the
learned Public Prosecutor-in-Charge who in all fairness submits that
the impugned order is not passed in accordance with law, this Court
finds that prior to issuance of proclamation against the accused
persons, it is required for the Court to first issue warrant of arrest.
After receiving non-execution report of warrant of arrest, the learned
Magistrate is empowered to issue an order of attachment, when
attachment fails, the accused may be declared as proclaimed
offender.
It appears from the order dated 31 st July, 2021 that warrant of
arrest was issued against the accused persons but execution report
was not received by the Trial Court.
It is also pointed out by the learned Public Prosecutor-in-
Charge that the petitioner has not annexed the orders dated 13 th
August, 2021 and 1st September, 2021. The learned Advocate for the
petitioner has handed over the certified copy of the order dated 1 st
September, 2021 where the learned Magistrate fixed 14 th December,
2021 for execution report of warrant of arrest in respect of the
accused persons whose names are appearing in the order dated 18 th
September, 2021.
The order per se is illegal.
Accordingly the order dated 18 th September, 2021 is set aside.
However, the instant revision has been filed by two petitioners out of
the above named 16 accused persons. The said two petitioners are
directed to surrender before the Trial Court within 7 days from the
date of this order.
The learned Trial Judge shall pass necessary order in respect of
the petitioners of the instant revision if they surrender in accordance
with law.
During this period, the execution of warrant of arrest against
the petitioners be stayed.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!