Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4293 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2022
Form J(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
C.R.R. 652 of 2022
With
CRAN 1 of 2022
Arijit Bhattacharjee @ Lt. Col. Arijit Bhattacharjee
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
For the petitioners : Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee
Mr. Abhijit Singh
Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee
For the State : Mr. Ranabi Roy Chowdhury,Adv.
Mr. Imran Ali, Adv.
Ms. Debjani Sahu
For the Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das
Ms. Rupsa Sreemani
Heard on : 18.07.2022
Judgment On : 18.07.2022.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
The petitioner is the husband of the opposite party no.2. The
petitioner has challenged his marriage with the opposite party on the
ground of nullity because of the fact that at the time of his marriage
with the opposite party no.2, the opposite party no.2 had a subsisting
marriage. The marriage between the petitioner and the opposite party
no.2 is void on the ground that on the date of marriage the opposite
party no.2 had a subsisting marriage.
The opposite party no.2 lodged a complaint against the
petitioner under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code
against the petitioner and the other matrimonial relation of the opposite
party no.2.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has
already filed Matrimonial Suit No. 104 of 2021 for Annulment of
Marriage under Section 24 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The said
suit is still pending.
Therefore, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire
proceedings, being G.R. Case No. 2423 of 2019 arising out of Titagarh
Police Station Case No. 258 of 2019 dated 24t h May, 2019 under
Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code presently pending
before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate at Barrackpore.
I have heard the learned advocates for the petitioner and the
opposite party. The fate of G.R. Case No. 2423 of 2019 depends upon
the final disposal of the Matrimonial Suit filed by the petitioner against
the opposite party no.2. If the marriage of the petitioner with the
opposite party no.2 is annulled by a decree passed by a competent civil
court, the charge under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code would
not stand.
In view of such circumstances, though this court cannot quash
the entire proceedings in G.R. Case No. 2423 of 2019, it is directed that
trial of G.R. Case No. 2423 of 2019 shall remain stayed till the final
disposal of Matrimonial Suit No. 104 of 2021 filed by the petitioner
against the opposite party no.2.
With the above order the instant criminal revision is disposed of
on contest, however, without cost. The connected application is also
disposed of.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!