Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 787 Cal
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2022
23rd February,
2022
(AK)
04
WPA 3042 of 2022
(Via Video Conference)
Mohammad Azad
Vs.
Union of India and others
Mr. Madhab Kumar Ray Chaudhury
...for the petitioner.
Mr. Brijesh Kr. Singh
...for the respondent no.4.
The petitioner challenges an order of eviction passed
against the petitioner by the respondent authorities
under Section 5 of the West Bengal Public Premises
(Eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act, 1971.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that,
without giving appropriate opportunity of hearing to the
petitioner and despite the subsistence of a trade license
issued by the respondents themselves, the notice under
Section 4 and subsequent proceedings under Section 5 of
the 1971 Act were undertaken.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents
submits that there is no legal impediment in passing an
order of eviction under Section 5 of the 1971 Act despite
the subsistence of a trade license.
Moreover, learned counsel controverts the
contention of the petitioner that no opportunity of hearing
was given to the petitioner.
Be that as it may, since the 1971 Act, under Section
9 thereof, specifically provides for a more efficacious
remedy of appeal than a writ petition, it would not be
prudent to interfere at this stage under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, more so because the remedy of
appeal available to the petitioner is evidently more
efficacious, since the appellate court/forum can enter
into factual as well as legal questions, whereas the writ
jurisdiction is restricted by certain parameters as are
well-established by several judgments of this court and
the Supreme Court.
In such view of the matter, WPA 3042 of 2022 is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the
appellate forum with an appeal under Section 9 of the
West Bengal Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized
Occupants) Act, 1971 within a week from date.
If so approached, the appellate authority shall
decide the same in accordance with law and upon giving
adequate opportunity of hearing to all the concerned
parties without being influenced in any manner by any of
the observations made herein.
For further clarification, the merits of the respective
contentions of the parties in connection with the
proceeding under Section 5 of the 1971 Act have not been
gone into by this court at all.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat copies of this order, if applied for,
be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite
formalities.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!