Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8056 Cal
Judgement Date : 5 December, 2022
05.12.2022
SL No.10
Court No.8
(gc)
FAT 100 of 2022
CAN 1 of 2022
Munmun Karmakar nee Ghosh
Vs.
Abhishek Karmakar
Mr. Rituparna De Ghose,
Mr. Siddhartha Paul,
Mr. Souryadeep Ghosh,
...for the Appellant/Petitioner.
Mr. Rajib Ray,
...for the Respondent.
Re: CAN 1 of 2022
The appeal is arising out of a decree for divorce
dated 30th December, 2021 in a suit filed under the
Special Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage on the
ground of cruelty. There shall be a stay of operation of
the impugned order till the disposal of the appeal. The
parties shall not re-marry in the meantime.
Without prejudice to the rights and contentions of
the parties and till we decide the maintenance, a prima
facie case has been made out for interim maintenance for
the sustenance of the wife and the child. Accordingly, we
direct the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- on or
before 31st December, 2022.
The appellant and the respondent shall file an
affidavit of disclosure of assets and liabilities in the form
as mentioned in Enclosure-I of the judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Rajnesh Vs. Neha reported in
2021 (2) SCC 314 on or before 6th January, 2023.
The matter shall be listed under the heading
"Application" on 16th January, 2023.
Re: FAT 100 of 2022
The department is directed to bring the L.C.R. from
the learned Trial Court within 10 days from date.
Upon arrival of the L.C.R, office is directed to
examine the same and if found complete shall serve notice
of arrival of the L.C.R. on the learned Counsel for the
appellant at once.
Mr. Rajib Ray, learned Counsel appearing for the
respondent accepts service of notice of appeal on behalf of
the respondent. As such, service of notice of appeal upon
the respondent is waived.
The appellant shall prepare and file requisite
number of informal paper books, printed, typewritten or
cyclostyled, as the case may be, out of court, within four
weeks after notice of arrival of the Lower Court's Record.
Liberty to mention.
Notwithstanding the admission of the appeal, we
feel that having regard to the nature of the controversy
and that the future of the child is at stake, Mediation
would be a better course to resolve the dispute between
the parties. Learned Counsel for the parties have also
submitted that the interest of the child is required to be
taken care of and the responsibilities of the parents
cannot be brushed aside.
In view thereof, we appoint Hon'ble Justice Mr. Debi
Prasad Dey, (Retired) and Dr. Anupurba Banerjee to act
as joint Mediators.
The parties are directed to produce the child before
the learned Mediators as and when required.
The parties are directed to render all assistance to
the learned Mediators in bringing about a settlement of all
their existing disputes in course of mediation.
The learned Mediators are requested to file an
interim report in the event the mediation is not concluded
by that time.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!