Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3154 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022
OD-1 [SUPPL.]
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL JURISDICTION (CENTRAL EXCISE)
ORIGINAL SIDE
CEXA/22/2021
IA NO:GA/02/2021
COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, HOWRAH COMMISSIONERATE
VS.
M/S. ASHIRWAD FOUNDRIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANOTHERS
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
And
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 21st December, 2022
Appearance :
Mr. Somak Basu, Adv.
The Court : - This matter has been listed under the caption "To Be Mentioned". It
is pointed out by the learned advocate appearing for the respondent/assessee that by
an order dated 30.6.2022 the second respondent, the Director of the first respondent
was deleted from the array of parties and this should be appropriately reflected in
paragraph 16 of the judgment.
We have heard learned counsel on the above submission. Accordingly, the
following paragraph shall be substituted instead of the existing paragraph 16.
"16. Thus, for all the above reasons the appeal is allowed. The order passed by
the learned tribunal is set aside and the order passed by the adjudicating authority is
restored in so far as the first respondent is concerned and the substantial questions of
law [a] to [g] are answered in favour of the revenue. Substantial question of law [h] is
rejected as the second respondent was deleted from the array of parties by order dated
30.6.2022. No cost."
This order shall form part of the judgment dated 16.12.2022.
The department is directed to make the necessary correction in the judgment.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) Pkd/GH.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!