Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5675 Cal
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022
22.08.2022
Court No.13
Item No.676
AP
WPA 12588 of 2022
Subrata Kumar Pan
Vs.
The State of West Bengal and Ors.
Ms. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya)
... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Somraj Dhar
... For the State.
Affidavit of service file in Court today is
taken on record.
The petitioner was a teacher of a school,
who retired on 31.12.2017. The first pension
payment order was issued on 17.06.2018. Under
the ROPA Rules, 2019 there was revision of the
pensionary and gratuity amount payable to the
petitioner. The revised pension payment order was
issued on 23.08.2021 and the revised gratuity and
revised arrear pension amount was disbursed on
23.08.2021 in terms of ROPA, 2019. The petitioner
claims interest on delayed payment of the revised
gratuity and revised arrear pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of
the writ petition, which the petitioner seeks to
justify by stating that there is no statutory period
of limitation and neither parties have suffered due
to this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner
that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P.
17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs.
State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate
Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court
judgment in the case of Union of India vs. Tarsem
Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue
2
of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay
or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that
relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not
affect the rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the
learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the
Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group
Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the
concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the
petitioner @ 8% per annum on the revised gratuity
and revised arrear pension amount calculated on
and from 14.02.2020 till the date of actual
payment. Such payment is to be made within a
period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been
called for, the allegations made in the writ petition
are deemed to have not been admitted by the
respondents.
There will be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!