Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5653 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
FMA 2197 of 2016
Item-
18-08-2022
131.
Ranen Mondal
Versus
Ct. 8 Smt. Soma Mondal
sg
None appears on behalf of the parties nor any
accommodation is prayed for on their behalf. The appellant was
also not present on the adjourned date.
The appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 3rd
June, 2015 in a Miscellaneous Suit/Case No. 18 of 2014. The
respondent filed an application under Section 25 of the Hindu
Marriage Act, praying for permanent alimony to the tune of
Rs.80,000/- per month. The respondent has given an estimate of
the expenses for herself and her minor son that are required
monthly for an honourable living. It appears from the evidence on
record that the average monthly income of the husband including
taxable benefits after deduction of income tax was Rs.1,60,000/-
in the year 2014 and Rs.25,00,000/- during the financial year
2010-11. the income of the appellant ahs increased over a period
of time. It is the obligation and duty of the appellant to ensure a
decent and conformable living for the minor child and his mother
and it is the duty of the Court to ensure that the petitioner,
respondent and the minor child are living with dignity and
conform and not in penury. (See (i) Vinny Parmvir Parmar vs.
Parmvir Parmar, reported in II (2011) DMC 754 (SC), (ii)
Moumita Roychourhury vs. Abjijit Chatterjee, reported in I
(2014) DMC 161 and U. Sree Vs. U. Srinivas, reported in (2013)
2 SCC 114].
On such consideration, we do not find any reason to
interfere with the order passed by the learned Trial Court. The
appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!