Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5429 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 August, 2022
12.08.2022 Item No.27 Ct. No.7 CHC
C.O.1773 of 2022
Prasanta Mondal Vs.
Smt. Molina Rani Mondal & ors.
Mr. Atis Kumar Biswas, Mr. Susenjit Banik, Mr. Amit Singh, Ms. Jyoti Agarwal ...for the petitioner
Subject-matter of challenge in this case is against
the order directing decreeholder to deposit cost of
police help.
Mr. Biswas, learned advocate appearing for the
petitioner submits that the copy of application under
Rule 208 CRO was not served upon the judgment-
debtor, while proposing for execution of a decree
passed in connection with a suit for specific
performance.
Upon perusal of the impugned order, it appears
that during the ongoing execution process, judgement-
debtor had the occasion to enter his appearance as
many as on two occasions. The interim protection as
proposed, in view of taking note of appearance of the
judgement-debtor in ongoing execution process, is not
entertainable at this stage.
Petitioner is directed to serve copy of this
application upon the opposite parties and their learned
advocate appearing in the court below, by Speed Post
with Acknowledgement Due and furnish affidavit-of-
service on the next returnable date.
Matter to appear in the list under the heaidng
"Adjourned Motion" three (03) weeks after.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!