Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5252 Cal
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2022
10.08.2022
Sl. No.631
ap
W.P.A. 12231 of 2022
Pranabes Bhaumik
-Vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mrs. Mithu Singha Mahapatra.
... ... for the petitioner
Mr. Pasupati Sana
....for the State.
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with
the record.
The petitioner was an 'Assistant Teacher' of a High
School, who retired on 29.02.2020. He had completed all
his pension related formalities prior to his retirement.
However, the concerned authorities delayed and released
his gratuity amount on 03.06.2021 in terms of ROPA,
2019. The petitioner herein seeks interest to be paid on
the gratuity for the interim period of delay in receipt of the
gratuity amount in terms of ROPA, 2019.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557
(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied
upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of
India vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on
the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of
pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief
2
may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the
rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of
West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to
pay interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the
revised gratuity calculated on and from 01.03.2020 till the
date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made
within a period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for,
the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!