Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2060 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 April, 2022
19.04.2022
SL No. 6
Court No. 24
(P.M)
In The High Court At Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA 9493 of 2016
with
IA No. CAN 1 of 2022
Jamini Mohan Datta
Vs
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Bratati Dutta
... for the petitioner.
Mr. Amal Kr. Sen, A.G.P.
Ms. Ashima Das (Sil)
.... For the State
The sole writ petitioner, Jamini Mohan
Datta, expired on 27th August, 2020. His wife
Shibani Datta has filed the instant application
for substitution.
It has been submitted that she is the
only heir and legal representative of the
deceased writ petitioner.
It has further been submitted that the
cause of action for filing the writ petition
survives even on the death of the petitioner.
The applicant being the widow of the
deceased teacher is entitled to the financial
reliefs which the teacher ought to have been
paid during his lifetime.
2
In view of the above, the application for
substitution stands allowed.
CAN 1 of 2022 is disposed of.
The issue to be decided in the present
writ petition is whether an employee will be
entitled to receive pension on and from the date
following retirement or from the date of refund
of the employer's share of contribution.
The husband of the petitioner retired
from service on attaining the age of
superannuation on 30.03.2002 and he died on
27.08.2020
.
In response to the notification published
by the School Education Department being No.
79-SE(L)/SL/5S-56/13(Pt-V) dated 13th June,
2014 issued in compliance of the direction
passed by the Hon'ble Special Bench of this
Court in the judgment dated 16th July, 2013 in
the matter of District Inspector of Schools (S.E.),
Kolkata -vs- Abhijit Baidya the husband of the
petitioner exercised option to switch over from
CPF to GPF and refunded the employer's share
of contribution with interest and additional
interest on 08.09.2014.
Pension Payment Order was issued in
favour of the husband of the petitioner with
effect from the date of refund of the employer's
share of contribution.
The petitioner claims that pension ought
to have been released on and from the next date
of retirement of the husband of the petitioner
and not from the date of refund of the
employer's share of contribution.
A similar issue has been decided by this
Court in the matter of WPA No. 964 of 2022
(Sitala Mandal (Chaudhuri) -vs- State of West
Bengal & Ors.).
The judgment passed in the aforesaid
matter on 8th February, 2022 will cover the
present writ petition.
As the teacher died in the meantime
accordingly the revised pension payment order
is required to be issued in favour of the widow
of the deceased employee.
Instant writ petition is disposed of by
directing the Director of Pension, Provident
Fund and Group Insurance and the concerned
Treasury Officer to verify the records, and in the
event, it is found, that the husband of the
petitioner exercised option and refunded the
employer's share of contribution within the time
specified in the notification dated 13th June,
2014, then steps shall be taken to issue Revised
Pension Payment Order in favour of the
petitioner with effect from the date following the
date of retirement on superannuation and to
release the pension in accordance with the
Revised Pension Payment Order. Such steps
shall be taken within a period of twelve weeks
from the date of communication of a copy of this
order. Payment shall positively be released
immediately upon issuance of the Revised
Pension Payment Order.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
Urgent certified photo copy of this order,
if applied for, be supplied to the parties
expeditiously on compliance of usual legal
formalities.
(Amrita Sinha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!