Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shibani Chattopadhyay & Anr vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr
2021 Latest Caselaw 4851 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4851 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Shibani Chattopadhyay & Anr vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 15 September, 2021
 4   15.9.2021                   (Via Video Conference)
Sc


                                  F.M.A. 890 of 2013

                                         --------------

Shibani Chattopadhyay & Anr.

Vs.

National Insurance co. Ltd. & Anr.

Mr. Jayana Kumar Mondal ...For the Appellants/ Claimants.

Mr. Samim Ahammed Mr. Aniruddha Singh.

...For the Respondent/ Insurance Company.

The appeal is directed against the Judgment and

award dated June 5, 2012 passed by the Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal, Special Judge-cum-Additional District &

Sessions Judge at Burdwan in MAC Case No.03 of

2010/08 of 2010 in a claim under Section 166 of the

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the death of one 'Biswapati

Chattopadhyay' in a vehicular accident dated November

06, 2009.

Various points have been raised by the claimants in

the instant appeal challenging the quantum of

compensation. It is submitted on behalf of the appellants

that the tribunal has erroneously not considered the

'future prospect' of the deceased. The claimants further

plead that the tribunal erred in granting only Rs.9,500/-

under the collective heads of 'general damages'.

Accordingly, it was argued that a lesser quantum of

compensation has been wrongfully awarded by the

tribunal.

Per contra, learned advocate representing the

Insurance company argues that in the facts and

circumstances of the case, the award is just and

reasonable and there is no further scope of enhancement

of the same.

Considering the judgements of Smt. Sarla Verma

& Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr.,

reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121 and National Insurance

Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in

(2017) 16 SCC 680, I find substance in the arguments of

the appellants/claimants. Appellants are justified in

praying for 30% addition of income on account of 'future

prospect'. The appellants/claimants should also be made

entitled to Rs.70,000/- under collective heads of general

damages. Accordingly, the impugned award is modified

and recalculated in the manner referred hereinafter.

      Particulars                               Amount (Rs.)

      Monthly Income                            Rs.13,971/-
      Annual Income                             Rs.1,67,652/
      Less 1/3rd for personal
      expenses (Rs.55,884/-)                    Rs.1,11,768/-
      Add 30% future prospect
      (Rs.33,530/-)                             Rs.1,45,298/-
      Multiplier '13'                           Rs.18,88,874/-
      Add 'General Damages'                     Rs.70,000/-
      TOTAL Principal Compensation              Rs.19,58,874/-
      LESS - awarded by Tribunal and





      paid by insurer                             Rs.14,62,484/-
      BALANCE (enhancement)                       Rs.4,96,390/-



The appellants/claimants acknowledge receipt of

the awarded amount of Rs.14,62,484/- with interest, in

terms of the direction of the tribunal. Accordingly, the

balance enhanced sum of Rs.4,96,395/- would become

payable to the appellants/claimants by the Insurance

Company with interest assessed @6% per annum on and

from the date of filing of the claim petition within a period

of 45 days from the date of receipt of the bank account

particulars of the appellants/claimants.

Learned advocate for the appellants/claimants will

forward the bank account details of the

appellants/claimants within a fortnight from date to the

learned advocate for the Insurance Company. The

payment shall be made to the appellants'/claimants'

bank accounts directly, in the proportion as decided by

the Court below.

With the above direction, the instant appeal is

disposed of.

In view of disposal of this appeal, connected

applications, if any, are also disposed of. The department

concerned is directed to tag the applications, if any with

the main appeal.

There will be no order as to costs.

LCR, if already called for, be returned back to the

Court below.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all

formalities, on priority basis.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter