Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1198 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 29 September, 2021
OD-35
EC 453 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
SREI EQUIPMENT FINANCE LIMITED
-VERSUS-
ASHISH TOMAR & ANR.
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR
Date : 29th September, 2021.
Appearance:
Mr. Swatarup Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Avishek Guha, Adv.
Ms. Akansha Chopra, Adv.
....for the decree-holder.
The Court: The decree-holder is represented.
None appears on behalf of the judgment-debtor no.2 nor is any accommodation
prayed for on their behalf. It appears from the earlier order dated January 17, 2020
that the judgment-debtor no.2 was represented.
Accordingly, the decree-holder is directed to serve a notice on the Advocate of
the judgment-debtor no.2 informing them of the returnable date.
It appears that notwithstanding the orders dated August 21, 2019 and January
17, 2020 the warrant of arrest issued against the judgement-debtor no.1 had not yet
been executed.
In view of the aforesaid, let a fresh warrant of arrest be issued against the
judgment-debtor no.1. The time to file the affidavit of assets is also extended till the
returnable date.
The matter is made returnable on November 16, 2021.
The jurisdictional Superintendent of Police and the Officer-in-Charge of the
local police station are directed to ensure due execution of the warrant of arrest and production of the judgment-debtor no.1 before this Court on or before the returnable
date.
The jurisdictional Superintendent of Police is also directed to file a report as to
why the warrant of arrest issued against the judgment-debtor no.1 had not yet been
executed till date.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)
s.pal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!