Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5673 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2021
D/L8 C.R.R. No.2189 of 2021 November (Via Video Conference) 15, 2021 Bpg.
In Re: An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;
Rimpa Sarangi & Anr.
Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Mr. Somnath Sarkar, Mr. Mujibar Ali Naskar, Mr. Shraman Sarkar, Mr. Hillol Saha Podder.
...for the petitioners.
Mr. Sabir Ahmed, learned advocate appearing on behalf
of the petitioners prays for quashing of the proceedings on the
ground that the police authorities have registered the case almost
after four months of the incident. Learned advocate further submits
that initially it was the present petitioners who complained to the
police authorities regarding the act/conduct of the complainant and
his associates for which Jhargram (Women) Police Station Case
No.95 of 2020 dated 30.08.2020 was registered for investigation
under Sections 341/509/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
According to the learned advocate, as charge-sheet has
already been submitted in connection with the said case being
Jhargram (Women) Police Station Case No.95 of 2020, then there is
no scope for the subsequent case being NCR Case No.29 of 2021
dated 14.01.2021 coming into effect as the outcome of the first
investigation could have revealed the incidents which have been
reflected in the subsequent case. The subsequent case is an
afterthought one, and is an abuse of the process of law, as such,
the same should be quashed.
I find that the complainant and the accused persons
have filed their cases against each other which have been
independently investigated by the investigating authority and on
completion of investigation each of the case, the police authorities
have placed their opinion before the learned court, and the learned
court took cognizance of the offence.
Learned CJM, Jhargram is directed to see that whether
the contents of the Jhargram (Women) Police Station Case No.95 of
2020 and NCR Case No.29 of 2021 dated 14.1.2021 are case and
counter-case. In case, the learned CJM, Jhargram comes to the
conclusion that the two cases are case and counter-case, the leaned
CJM, Jhargram would deal with both the cases himself or delegate
to a particular Magistrate who would try the cases one after the
other and deliver the judgment on the same date.
Needless to state that the issues so raised before this
Court were restricted to the contents of the revisional application
and this Court has not gone into the truth and falsity of the
allegations. As such, the learned Magistrate trying the case would
independently consider the issues and arrive at his own finding by
ignoring any of the observations made by this Court while disposing
of the present revisional application.
No interference is called for at this stage before this
Court.
Accordingly, CRR 2189 of 2021 is disposed of.
Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!