Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 88 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021
07.01.
45
2021
AG
M FAT 64 of 2020
Ct With
02 CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN 1457 0f 2020)
(Via Video Conference)
Sri Kiriti Bhusan Mukherjee
vs
Smt. Tupurani Mukherjee & Ors
Ms. Prajaani Das,
... For the Appellant.
The suit for partition and separation of share is
dismissed by the Trial Court on a technical ground that
all the co-sharers have not been impleaded as a party
therein. According to learned advocate for the
appellant, there is an apparent illegality in the said
judgment as the Court did not consider that apart from
the parties, there is no co-sharer of the said property.
It appears from the document annexed to the
instant application that the petitioner/ appellant was
enjoying the interim order of injunction during the
pendency of the said suit property.
After perusing the averments as well as the
findings recorded in the said impugned order, we are
not inclined to pass the ad interim order in the form in
which the same was passed by the Trial Court.
However, if the possession is disturbed, it may invite
anomalous situation. The possession of the respective
parties are not in dispute.
We, therefore, direct the parties to maintain
status quo with regard to possession in respect of the
suit property for a period of four weeks from date or
until further order, whichever is earlier.
The appellant is directed to serve the copy of the
application upon the respondents by speed post and file
affidavit-of-service on the returnable date.
The application is made returnable after three weeks.
(Kausik Chanda , J) (Harish Tandon, J)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!